--On 22. September 2006 20:15:01 +0200 Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 9/18/06, Stefan H. Holek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, this is a blocker IMO as it breaks FTP for a whole class of
virtual hosting scenarios. No, I don't know how to fix, maybe Lennart?
Yeah, I think so
On 9/18/06, Stefan H. Holek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, this is a blocker IMO as it breaks FTP for a whole class of
virtual hosting scenarios. No, I don't know how to fix, maybe Lennart?
Yeah, I think so. It's a mess.
Basically, 2.10 looks for subobjects using __getitem__ before it looks
u
Yes, this is a blocker IMO as it breaks FTP for a whole class of
virtual hosting scenarios. No, I don't know how to fix, maybe Lennart?
Stefan
On 17. Sep 2006, at 12:52, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 17. September 2006 12:38:11 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
AFAIK,
--On 17. September 2006 12:38:11 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
AFAIK, Stefan Hollek checked it in to demonstrate an incompatibility of
Zope 2.10 vs. 2.9. See http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/2187.
Ahh..I remember.
@Stefan: is this a blocker? Any chance to
AFAIK, Stefan Hollek checked it in to demonstrate an incompatibility of
Zope 2.10 vs. 2.9. See http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/2187.
Andreas Jung wrote:
Those two tests are currently failing on the 2.10 branch (updated with
the Zope 3.3.0rc1 code). Any hints?
Andreas
---
E