On Mar 21, 2008, at 6:54 PM, David Pratt wrote:
Hi Jim. OK great. Many thanks for elaborating. This will be
progressive. I had been considering an application use case without
a zodb. Is this the scenario that the basic publisher would
facilitate?
No-more so than the existing publisher.
Hi Jim. OK great. Many thanks for elaborating. This will be progressive.
I had been considering an application use case without a zodb. Is this
the scenario that the basic publisher would facilitate?
Regards,
David
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Mar 21, 2008, at 12:10 PM, David Pratt wrote:
Hi Jim.
On Mar 21, 2008, at 12:55 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Mar 21, 2008, at 12:15 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thoughts? Objections?
I've caught the repoze bug, and if this makes a Repoze.zope3 easier
to
do/happier, then I'm
On Mar 21, 2008, at 12:15 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thoughts? Objections?
I've caught the repoze bug, and if this makes a Repoze.zope3 easier to
do/happier, then I'm all for it.
I suspect the work I did a couple of wee
On Mar 21, 2008, at 12:10 PM, David Pratt wrote:
Hi Jim. What does this mean?
It wouldn't have any visible effect on zope.publisher. Applications
that use zope.publisher wouldn't see a change.
There would be an alternative to zope.publisher that has far fewer
dependencies and fewer feat
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thoughts? Objections?
I've caught the repoze bug, and if this makes a Repoze.zope3 easier to
do/happier, then I'm all for it.
In fact, I wouldn't mind if repoze became the official zope3 story. It
would definitely help towar
Hi Jim. What does this mean? Will the new package be a drop in
replacement for what we have without some direction on what to do with
the other bit or will it break our applications. A working publisher is
pretty essential to a functioning zope app. Does this mean the end of
deprecation warning
On Mar 21, 2008, at 11:09 AM, Benji York wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
This new package would a number of things [...]
This new package would do what to a number of things?
Gaaah. Sorry.
It would omit them. :)
Jim
--
Jim Fulton
Zope Corporation
Jim Fulton wrote:
This new package would a number of things [...]
This new package would do what to a number of things?
--
Benji York
Senior Software Engineer
Zope Corporation
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/l
I'd like reduce the barrier of entry for using the Zope 3 zope
publisher. Right now, it has quite a few dependencies setuptools,
zope.component, zope.event, zope.exceptions, zope.i18n,
zope.interface, zope.location, zope.proxy, zope.security,
zope.deprecation, and zope.deferredimport.
10 matches
Mail list logo
