On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 12:03:44 PM Tres Seaver wrote:
> > We only moved packages that are still checked by winbot and the pnes
> > that we ported because we use them in our project.
>
> 250+ of them? OK, I retract my concern then, if you are actually using
> them.
The rough split is like t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/13/2013 12:05 PM, Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 11:31:10 AM Tres Seaver wrote:
>>> FWIW whenever I get a failure notification from Travis about a
>>> package that doesn't have a .travis.yml, I uncheck the Active
>>> check
On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 11:31:10 AM Tres Seaver wrote:
> > FWIW whenever I get a failure notification from Travis about a
> > package that doesn't have a .travis.yml, I uncheck the Active checkbox
> > in Github repo settings.
>
> Unless the project already passes all its tests when run manual
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/12/2013 10:41 AM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> FWIW whenever I get a failure notification from Travis about a
> package that doesn't have a .travis.yml, I uncheck the Active checkbox
> in Github repo settings.
Unless the project already passes all
On Tuesday, March 12, 2013 04:41:23 PM Marius Gedminas wrote:
> > Note: I think most packages pass fine under Travis, but some are failing
> > for some obscure reasons.
>
> An overview would be good.
>
> I could add a Travis column to http://zope3.pov.lt/py3/, I suppose. The
> image URLs are tr
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 08:35:46AM -0400, Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Monday, March 11, 2013 10:09:51 PM Tres Seaver wrote:
> > Also, is somebody running / reporting tests via
> > Travis? Where are those results going?
>
> They should be running for all packages. I have turned off any notificatio
On Monday, March 11, 2013 10:09:51 PM Tres Seaver wrote:
> > Of course, the alpha releases are really stable, all the tests pass
> > under Python 2.6 and 2.7.
>
> I'm agreed for the most part. Can we make it a priority to fix the
> failing nightly tests?
I have asked Adam to create lxml 3.1 bina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/11/2013 08:40 PM, Stephan Richter wrote:
> Fred asked about the reasoning behind recent version numbers as we
> ported packages to Python 3.
>
> We decided that any package that depends on an alpha or unreleased
> package should itself be an al
Hi everyone,
Fred asked about the reasoning behind recent version numbers as we ported
packages to Python 3.
We decided that any package that depends on an alpha or unreleased package
should itself be an alpha release. There are 2 packages that started the
avalanche:
* zope.security: Tres wan
