On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Chris Withers wrote:
> I'm guessing this is the point at which your problems become mine? ;-)
*evil laughter* Yes :-)
We should write about it and publish it to the community...
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http:
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Andreas Jung wrote:
>
> > These are good ideas to improve the TextIndex. I already encouraged
> > Erik to put alltogether into a Fishbowl proposal,
>
> Which I would do, if I had time. Which I will have, but not for another
> two weeks. :-)
I'm guessing this is the point
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Andreas Jung wrote:
> These are good ideas to improve the TextIndex. I already encouraged
> Erik to put alltogether into a Fishbowl proposal,
Which I would do, if I had time. Which I will have, but not for another
two weeks. :-)
___
>
> Rik Hoekstra writes:
> > This raises the question how dependent the splitter on the paticularities of the
> > document source - I do not really see how different splitters could be useful
> > for one single document. This is perhaps less obvious than it appears, as you
> > may want to use
ough" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Erik Enge"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 4:59 PM
Subject: Re: PossitionIndex (was: Re: [Zope-dev] ZCatalog phrase
indexingrevisited)
> Rik Hoekstra writes:
> > This raises the question how depe
Rik Hoekstra writes:
> This raises the question how dependent the splitter on the paticularities of the
> document source - I do not really see how different splitters could be useful
> for one single document. This is perhaps less obvious than it appears, as you
> may want to use different sp
ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 11:39 AM
Subject: Re: PossitionIndex (was: Re: [Zope-dev] ZCatalog phrase
indexingrevisited)
> On Sun, 17 Jun 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> > index_object, because the splitter return has all the words
On Sun, 17 Jun 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> index_object, because the splitter return has all the words
> in order, even the dupes... as you iterate, you can mutate
Is this part of the current formal Splitter Interface? If not,
it needs to be if other code is going to depend on it.
Oh, yeah, a
>
> > Once you're satisfied with the implementation, would you be willing
> > submit the module to the collector?
>
> Do you think you (or someone else for that matter) could have a look at
> [1] the method that returns the position in the document - positionInDoc()
> - to how that could be made
Chris McDonough wrote:
>
> It just occurred to me that depending on the splitter to do
> positions makes it impossible to alter the splitter without
> reindexing the whole text index... but I think this is a
> reasonable tradeoff. Other opinions welcome.
>
This raises the question how depend
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> A lot of folks who do "power searches," say, librarians or other trained
> researchers, familiar with the bells and whistles of more powerful search
> engines, will want a simple operator for proximity, with the ability to
> specify proximity depth:
>
> For examp
On Sun, 17 Jun 2001 21:05:47 +0200 (CEST)
Erik Enge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
>
> > Once you're satisfied with the implementation, would
> you be willing
> > submit the module to the collector?
>
> Do you think you (or someone else for that matter)
It just occurred to me that depending on the splitter to do
positions makes it impossible to alter the splitter without
reindexing the whole text index... but I think this is a
reasonable tradeoff. Other opinions welcome.
On Sun, 17 Jun 2001 15:57:20 -0400
"Chris McDonough" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> Once you're satisfied with the implementation, would you be willing
> submit the module to the collector?
Do you think you (or someone else for that matter) could have a look at
[1] the method that returns the position in the document - positionInDoc
On Sat, 16 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Lexis-Nexis: Sean w/2 Upton (where w/2 is within 2 words)
This wouldn't be hard to make happen. I don't know if it is better to do
it before of after the parsers, though. Maybe a more userfriendly alias
would be best as a default?
___
rch.
Sean
-Original Message-
From: Chris McDonough [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2001 2:59 AM
To: Erik Enge
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PossitionIndex (was: Re: [Zope-dev] ZCatalog phrase
indexingrevisited)
Erik Enge wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Chr
Erik Enge wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
>
> > Once you're satisfied with the implementation, would you be willing
> > submit the module to the collector?
>
> Will do. Have you thought about how users actually are to use
> exact-phrase? What I'm thinking I will do here
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> Once you're satisfied with the implementation, would you be willing
> submit the module to the collector?
Will do. Have you thought about how users actually are to use
exact-phrase? What I'm thinking I will do here (currently I've only been
testing
ent: Friday, June 15, 2001 11:53 AM
Subject: Re: PossitionIndex (was: Re: [Zope-dev] ZCatalog phrase
indexingrevisited)
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Erik Enge wrote:
>
> > To be really useful I think the PossitionIndex' _proximity dictionary
> > needs to be turned into a BTree
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Erik Enge wrote:
> To be really useful I think the PossitionIndex' _proximity dictionary
> needs to be turned into a BTree of some sort, but apart from that I
> don't know what is missing.
It's now using BTrees. And I renamed it to PositionIndex (thanks to
Chris Withers for
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> Excellent! I haven't looked at it in detail, but thanks very much for
> contributing it! Maybe we can roll some of this work into a
> position-aware Text Index
It is actually a TextIndex on steoroids. Remove the _proximity attribute
and a couple of
To: "Chris McDonough" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Oren Yosifon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 12:45 PM
Subject: Re: PossitionIndex (was: Re: [Zope-dev] ZCatalog phrase
indexingrevisited)
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Erik Eng
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Erik Enge wrote:
> Me got a patch: http://nittin.net/erik/software/PossitionIndex>.
And I should mention that it has only been tested on Zope 2.3.2.
(BTW, thanks, Chris, for suggesting how to code it.)
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
23 matches
Mail list logo
