Chris Withers wrote at 2009-4-2 20:36 +0100:
...
Personally, I evaluate such eggs in a sandbox, and then add them to the
project-specific index once I'm sure that they work with the other
software in the index: I don't use PyPI at all when building out
production sites.
That seems overly
Tres Seaver wrote:
Personally, I evaluate such eggs in a sandbox, and then add them to the
project-specific index once I'm sure that they work with the other
software in the index: I don't use PyPI at all when building out
production sites.
That seems overly heavyweight for the average new
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Withers wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
Personally, I evaluate such eggs in a sandbox, and then add them to the
project-specific index once I'm sure that they work with the other
software in the index: I don't use PyPI at all when building out
Tres Seaver wrote:
Chris Withers wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
I mean an index which supplies the 'simple' PyPI interface, such that we
could tell people to 'easy_install' from it, e.g.:
$ /path/to/bin/easy_install -i http://kgs.zope.org/Zope2/2.1.2
But how
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Withers wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
Chris Withers wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
I mean an index which supplies the 'simple' PyPI interface, such that we
could tell people to 'easy_install' from it, e.g.:
$
Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
I mean an index which supplies the 'simple' PyPI interface, such that we
could tell people to 'easy_install' from it, e.g.:
$ /path/to/bin/easy_install -i http://kgs.zope.org/Zope2/2.1.2
But how do you then set things up when you want
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Withers wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
I mean an index which supplies the 'simple' PyPI interface, such that we
could tell people to 'easy_install' from it, e.g.:
$ /path/to/bin/easy_install -i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jung wrote:
On 16.03.2009 4:52 Uhr, Tres Seaver wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
On 15.03.2009 18:42 Uhr, Tres Seaver wrote:
Original Message
Subject: [Bug 343079] [NEW] Broken distribution (2009-03-15)
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009
Tres Seaver wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
Please look at the getPackages() method taking the version*cfg files
into account. So all versions should be pinned. However there is
obviously a difference between using buildout with pinned versions
and setuptools or a small undetected hole in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16.03.2009 17:40 Uhr, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
Please look at the getPackages() method taking the version*cfg files
into account. So all versions should be pinned. However there is
obviously a difference
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16.03.2009 17:21 Uhr, Tres Seaver wrote:
Maybe generating indexes from the varios known good metadata we are
already maintaining would be the right path.
By index you refer to a KGS or a release-specific directory containing
the blessed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jung wrote:
On 16.03.2009 17:21 Uhr, Tres Seaver wrote:
Maybe generating indexes from the varios known good metadata we are
already maintaining would be the right path.
By index you refer to a KGS or a release-specific directory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
Please look at the getPackages() method taking the version*cfg files
into account. So all versions should be pinned. However there is
obviously a difference between using buildout
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jung wrote:
On 15.03.2009 18:42 Uhr, Tres Seaver wrote:
Original Message
Subject: [Bug 343079] [NEW] Broken distribution (2009-03-15)
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 07:42:00 -
From: dmaurer die...@handshake.de
Reply-To:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16.03.2009 4:52 Uhr, Tres Seaver wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
On 15.03.2009 18:42 Uhr, Tres Seaver wrote:
Original Message
Subject: [Bug 343079] [NEW] Broken distribution (2009-03-15)
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 07:42:00 -
15 matches
Mail list logo
