Thanks All,
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 21:55 +0100, Carsten Senger wrote:
>
> Sure you can have specialized fields that subclass from Field, TextLine,
> or another base class. E.g. RegistrationNumber(TextLine) that takes care
> to validate the input for a special format. But you use them in an
> i
Hi Shane,
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 14:10 -0700, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> Sorry, but the patch doesn't make any sense. Your version of
> _validate_fields quietly skips validation entirely by default.
First of all that is why I asked for others to look at it. :-)
But I DID test it by inserting an
Hi Tim,
Tim Cook schrieb:
> Thanks for all the assistance.
>
> On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 18:05 +0100, Martijn Faassen wrote:
>
>> Yes, you do create new schema fields by subclassing from Field.
>>
>> It's just that we saw you putting a field not in a schema but in what
>> looked like a concrete obje
Thanks for all the assistance.
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 18:05 +0100, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Yes, you do create new schema fields by subclassing from Field.
>
> It's just that we saw you putting a field not in a schema but in what
> looked like a concrete object.
This has given me a BIG pause wh
Hey,
>> To debug this
>> problem, a developer will need the smallest possible example of code
>> that demonstrates the problem. That means, I take it, just 2 schemas
>> and a single form. Describe briefly what you expect to happen and what
>> in fact happens. If that example can be done *without*
Tim Cook wrote:
> I would also like for you to explain just what it is about my "attitude"
> that you find so offensive/problematic?
As a general rule of thumb, anyone who posts with more than on
exlamation mark is likely on the wrong track.
Cross posting to several lists is also a bit of a no
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 15:55 +0100, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> I don't think a wiki page with a chronicle is necessary or even
> helpful; you need to give us the information necessary to find the
> bug, but no distracting surrounding information.
Okay.
> To debug this
> problem, a developer will n
Hey,
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Tim Cook wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 22:05 +0100, Martijn Faassen wrote:
>
>> Okay, I'll take another look then and look at ObjectRef. Ah, yes, Dan
>> pointed out to you that you are using a zope.schema.Field in a class
>> instead of in a schema (an inter
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 22:05 +0100, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Okay, I'll take another look then and look at ObjectRef. Ah, yes, Dan
> pointed out to you that you are using a zope.schema.Field in a class
> instead of in a schema (an interface). That isn't right, and since the
> direct use of that
Tim Cook wrote:
> I DID submit a patch suggestion in the Launchpad bug report.
I think you're talking about this:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope3/+bug/301226
Sorry, but the patch doesn't make any sense. Your version of
_validate_fields quietly skips validation entirely by default. Why
wou
Hi there,
Tim Cook wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 11:05 +, Chris Withers wrote:
[snip]
> So again, referring to the subject line. What are the next steps?
I am trying to understand the history of the discussion, which has a lot
of text and is widespread.
I think Dan Korostelev tried buildi
On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 11:05 +, Chris Withers wrote:
> I can't. The testrunner is already there and buildout-based development
> makes it trivial to run. svn already does the patch creation for you:
>
> $ svn diff
>
> > be able to get past that bit. Perhaps a kind Zope dev will pick up on
>
Hedley Roos wrote:
> Chris mentioned unit tests. You do not have to write a new unit test.
> What is required is to have a look at the tests and then identify one
> that is relevant to your problematic method. This test should be very
> easy to read. The "hard" part is for you to expand this test t
Hi Tim
I'm more involved with Plone but can provide a slightly more
digestible answer :)
Chris mentioned unit tests. You do not have to write a new unit test.
What is required is to have a look at the tests and then identify one
that is relevant to your problematic method. This test should be ver
Thanks Dieter,
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 19:41 +0100, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> I often approach situations like this with so called "Monkey Patches":
> I replace or enhance classes or methods during startup (triggered
> by some startup event).
>
> This may not be optimal but allows me to solve my probl
Tim Cook wrote at 2008-12-18 08:35 -0200:
> ...
>"Yeah we use the really cool, robust, well tested and trusted
>application server called the Zope Component Architecture because it
>really shows the strengths of the open source development process. Oh,
>by the way, after everything is installed yo
16 matches
Mail list logo
