Re: [Zope-dev] RFC: Proposed backward-compatibility policy

2004-10-27 Thread Jim Fulton
Chris McDonough wrote: Maybe we should have a bw compat "category" in the collector(s) for this to make it easy to find bw compat issues. It would make it easy to get a list of "showstopper" issues around release time. Great idea! Jim -- Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python P

Re: [Zope-dev] RFC: Proposed backward-compatibility policy

2004-10-27 Thread Chris McDonough
Maybe we should have a bw compat "category" in the collector(s) for this to make it easy to find bw compat issues. It would make it easy to get a list of "showstopper" issues around release time. - C On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 14:22 -0400, Jim Fulton wrote: > Andreas Jung wrote: > > > > > > --On Mi

Re: [Zope-dev] RFC: Proposed backward-compatibility policy

2004-10-27 Thread Jim Fulton
Andreas Jung wrote: --On Mittwoch, 27. Oktober 2004 9:49 Uhr -0400 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 3. It is very important to catch backward compatibility problems during development of new releases. In particular, it is important to test new Zope releases before they are release

Re: [Zope-dev] RFC: Proposed backward-compatibility policy

2004-10-27 Thread Andreas Jung
--On Mittwoch, 27. Oktober 2004 9:49 Uhr -0400 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 3. It is very important to catch backward compatibility problems during development of new releases. In particular, it is important to test new Zope releases before they are released in final form.

Re: [Zope-dev] RFC: Proposed backward-compatibility policy

2004-10-27 Thread Santi Camps
En/na Jim Fulton ha escrit: Chris McDonough wrote: This sounds good. I would add perhaps the concept of a 'smoke test' application for backwards compatibility testing. For Zope 2, the smoke test might be Plone or another large app written on top of it. Maybe someone involved in Zope 2 release mana

Re: [Zope-dev] RFC: Proposed backward-compatibility policy

2004-10-27 Thread Jim Fulton
Chris McDonough wrote: This sounds good. I would add perhaps the concept of a 'smoke test' application for backwards compatibility testing. For Zope 2, the smoke test might be Plone or another large app written on top of it. Maybe someone involved in Zope 2 release management would volunteer to ru

Re: [Zope-dev] RFC: Proposed backward-compatibility policy

2004-10-27 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
On Oct 27, 2004, at 15:49, Jim Fulton wrote: Below is a proposed policy on backward compatibility for Zope. Zope Policy on Backward Compatibility = +1, even regardless of its actual content. Having a policy at all is a lot better than the "I gotta ask X people"

Re: [Zope-dev] RFC: Proposed backward-compatibility policy

2004-10-27 Thread Chris McDonough
This sounds good. I would add perhaps the concept of a 'smoke test' application for backwards compatibility testing. For Zope 2, the smoke test might be Plone or another large app written on top of it. Maybe someone involved in Zope 2 release management would volunteer to run the "smoke test app