Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
[snip]
It appears there is an assumption that merging Z2 and Z3 code within Z2
itself is an unmitigated good thing, but IMHO, each is complicated
enough in their own right that I'd personally prefer to be dealing with
one or the other at any given time and not both. This
Chris McDonough wrote:
On Sat, 2005-03-19 at 12:23, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Chris McDonough wrote:
[snip]
I assume these caveats are spelled out here because Z3 developers don't
want to slow down Z3 development to test/maintain Z2 compatibility. I
know a lot about Z2 code, but I know very little
On Sat, 2005-03-19 at 12:23, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Chris McDonough wrote:
[snip]
I assume these caveats are spelled out here because Z3 developers don't
want to slow down Z3 development to test/maintain Z2 compatibility. I
know a lot about Z2 code, but I know very little about Z3 code.
Chris McDonough wrote:
[snip]
I assume these caveats are spelled out here because Z3 developers don't
want to slow down Z3 development to test/maintain Z2 compatibility. I
know a lot about Z2 code, but I know very little about Z3 code. I'd
like that to change, but it's likely that I'll just not
- It *will be* the responsibility of the Zope 2 devs to
make sure Z2 works with the version of Z3 bundled at the
time.
snip
It'd be great if active Z3 developers could actually help make new
releases of Z2 once Five is integrated but the above makes it sound
like
a we'll throw it over
