On Thursday 20 December 2007, Ignas Mikalajunas wrote:
> In SchoolTool we used to start another server for REST to have a
> different Publication for REST calls.
I like that approach best too. I decided to use it in z3c.rest. A custom
publication object allows you to implement an API that makes m
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 21.12.2007, 10:28 +0100 schrieb Christian Theune:
> b) We intended to remove the functionality this week as it was not
> agreed on to include. However, we (gocept) found that it was already
> released in the 3.4 series as we (gocept) let the topic slip for too
> long. This mean
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 21.12.2007, 10:28 +0100 schrieb Christian Theune:
> We have different to topics that need discussion/decision:
>
> a) There is breakage in publisher eggs for which the XML-RPC stuff
> assumed to be the reason. I'll figure out what's going on there today so
> that the immediate
Am Freitag, den 21.12.2007, 12:39 -0500 schrieb Jim Fulton:
> Good job! :)
>
> I agree that this is really annoying.
>
> Really, this needs to get unscrewed. I'm skeptical that this is
> "released in 3.4" since a dependency on an unreleased alpha egg is
> involved.
It turns out that there
Hey,
Am Freitag, den 21.12.2007, 12:32 -0500 schrieb Chris McDonough:
> I also have zero opinion about this but I'll note as the dedicated
> whiner, that, delta some policy change, until this gets worked out,
> the Cheese Shop is broken for people who want to install zope.app*
> packages (an
Good job! :)
I agree that this is really annoying.
Really, this needs to get unscrewed. I'm skeptical that this is
"released in 3.4" since a dependency on an unreleased alpha egg is
involved.
Jim
On Dec 21, 2007, at 12:32 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
I also have zero opinion about this b
I also have zero opinion about this but I'll note as the dedicated
whiner, that, delta some policy change, until this gets worked out,
the Cheese Shop is broken for people who want to install zope.app*
packages (and other related packages). A release of zope.traversing
has a dependency on
Hey,
Am Freitag, den 21.12.2007, 09:58 +0100 schrieb Christian Zagrodnick:
> Yes, what do others think? It's quite hard for me to do anything
> because the discussion is kind of nebulous.
We have different to topics that need discussion/decision:
a) There is breakage in publisher eggs for which
> I don't really have time to read this whole discussion, but note that
> Grok's REST support uses ++rest++ and then provides a rest
> layer (for that protocol) to the request. That sounds quite similar to
> what you are proposing for XMLRPC.
>
> It's still ugly as POST and GET need to be handled b
