Hi Benji, Adam
> Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] zope.testing 3.6.0 released
>
> Hello Benji,
>
> I think we solved that problem at the Blackforest sprint in
> Freiburg with Roger. As I remember there are tests for that too.
Yes, we solved the issue that the coverage feature
wa
Hello Benji,
I think we solved that problem at the Blackforest sprint in Freiburg
with Roger. As I remember there are tests for that too.
Wednesday, October 22, 2008, 8:46:19 PM, you wrote:
BY> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 3:20 AM, Adam GROSZER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Seems like 86
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 3:20 AM, Adam GROSZER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Seems like 86460 breaks it.
>
> I have some idea why testrunner-coverage.txt does not detect this.
> I think it is doing coverage just on the tests code. There seems to be
> no "application"-like code. All code se
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Adam GROSZER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey Benji,
>
> Seems that it breaks coverage...
In what way is coverage broken? With or without -j? Can you formulate
a test that demonstrates the breakage?
> The result looks like coverage is started after importing the
Hey Benji,
Seems that it breaks coverage...
The result looks like coverage is started after importing the modules
to test. That means declarations do not seem to 'run', but just the code
inbetween them.
Checked with 3.5.1, it looks fine.
--
Best regards,
Adam GROSZER
