On Apr 18, 2005, at 13:31, Zachery Bir wrote:
It's been a tricky business. For our part, we've been using PAS to
separate the concerns of the folks using both the app server
(traditional ZMI stuff) and folks using the application, and allow the
application to talk directly to the plugins that co
On Apr 18, 2005, at 3:17 AM, Kapil Thangavelu wrote:
agreed. the implementation itself was briefly done as a monkey patch,
which the previous email was an artifact of, and then changed to a
custom user factory and user class, which delegates to an internal
local roles plugin type. unfortunately
On Apr 18, 2005, at 9:17, Kapil Thangavelu wrote:
On Apr 11, 2005, at 1:51 PM, Zachery Bir wrote:
On 2005-02-07 17:44:21 -0500, Kapil Thangavelu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
hi folks,
i'd like to see a new plugin type for local roles plugins. the major
driving reason is to enable a local roles block
On Apr 11, 2005, at 1:51 PM, Zachery Bir wrote:
On 2005-02-07 17:44:21 -0500, Kapil Thangavelu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
hi folks,
i'd like to see a new plugin type for local roles plugins. the major
driving reason is to enable a local roles blocking policy on
containers.
i've got a version of i
On 2005-02-07 17:44:21 -0500, Kapil Thangavelu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
hi folks,
i'd like to see a new plugin type for local roles plugins. the major
driving reason is to enable a local roles blocking policy on containers.
i've got a version of it implemented and if its sounds good i'll setup a
