Hello Stephan,
Seems like you smashed it, now a ComponentLookupError exception is
coming which seems adequate.
Tuesday, January 3, 2006, 8:00:49 PM, you wrote:
On Thursday 15 December 2005 08:17, Adam Groszer wrote:
If I make a schema which has no registered widget, then no exception,
no
Hello.
Thank you for replying.
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Monday 12 December 2005 09:08, Yoshito Komatsu wrote:
Are there any problems with adding them?
Nope, +1.
I made the patches.
May I commit them by myself?
Or, should I submit them to Issue Collector?
Regards,
--
Yoshito Komatsu
Latest zwiki allows each subscriber to choose all edits or just the
comments/creations, which is enough for most people.
NB if the community wants, I would host the zope3 wiki on the
zopewiki.org server for as long as that's useful - until zope3.org or
whatever. This would allow us to fix a
Brian,
What are you trying to accomplish with this test? I think buildbot does a
better
job. If there is a function you'd like to suggest for our emerging buildbot
setup,
I'd like to hear it.
A message like this, with no useful information might as well be spam.
Jim
Zope 3 tarball
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 07:08:59AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
Brian,
What are you trying to accomplish with this test?
This is the result of building and testing the tarball/multiple
tarballs. I started this because zope3 was breaking my schooltool
nightly tarball build too often.
Practically
On Wednesday 04 January 2006 04:18, Yoshito Komatsu wrote:
May I commit them by myself?
Or, should I submit them to Issue Collector?
Please commit them yourself.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k - Web Software Design,
Am Samstag, 31. Dezember 2005 14:48 schrieb Florian Lindner:
Am Freitag, 30. Dezember 2005 20:57 schrieb Jeff Shell:
On 12/30/05, Florian Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Freitag, 30. Dezember 2005 17:45 schrieb Jim Fulton:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
So, what you want is
On 1/3/06, Wade Leftwich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
To bring it to the point: _scripters_ should be able to develop in Zope
3 as easy as in Zope 2 :-)
Or at least almost as easily as in RoR or Django. TTW is not a
requirement; Chris McDonough's TTB posting was right on
On 1/4/06, Jeff Shell wrote:
On 1/3/06, Wade Leftwich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
To bring it to the point: _scripters_ should be able to develop in Zope
3 as easy as in Zope 2 :-)
Or at least almost as easily as in RoR or Django. TTW is not a
requirement; Chris McDonough's
Jim Fulton wrote at 2006-1-3 14:41 -0500:
...
I think 12 months is a bit short. I don't think the backward-compatibility
code
is that burdonsome, once written. What do other folks think?
If the backward compatibility period gets shorter,
we will skip more and more releases because of the
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 11:29:47AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
Brian Sutherland wrote:
Yes, building and testing tarballs.
What does this mean? What tar balls? Do you mean releases?
basically the contents of releases/Zope-test.py.
For schooltool, the testing script I use is the same as the
[Dieter Maurer]
If the backward compatibility period gets shorter,
we will skip more and more releases because of the increased burden
to get our applications running again...
Well, every new release will remove features deprecated N releases
ago, where N is presumably some constant whose
12 matches
Mail list logo
