[Zope3-dev] Re: [Zope3-Users] How does the static-apidoc script works?

2006-09-07 Thread Florian Lindner
Am Mittwoch, 6. September 2006 12:25 schrieb Stephan Richter: > On Monday 14 August 2006 17:46, Florian Lindner wrote: > > ow does that script works? Executing gives an error: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/Zope3 $ python utilities/static-apidoc > > /home/florian/z3-doc/ Traceback (most recent call la

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Re: Zope 3 as a reliable platform?!?

2006-09-07 Thread Lennart Regebro
On 9/7/06, Rocky Burt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My experience so far... after not having touched a project for over a year and than the client wanting some work done, they usually expect to have to pay to have it upgraded. Well, in any case, they SHOULD expect that. -- Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo

[Zope3-dev] buildbot failure in Zope3 branches 3.3 2.4 Windows 2000 zc-bbwin

2006-09-07 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 branches 3.3 2.4 Windows 2000 zc-bbwin. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: changes Build Source Stamp: 7521 Blamelist: flox BUILD FAILED: failed failed slave lost sincerely, -The Buildbot ___

[Zope3-dev] buildbot failure in Zope3 branches 3.3 2.4 Windows 2000 zc-bbwin

2006-09-07 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 branches 3.3 2.4 Windows 2000 zc-bbwin. Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/ Build Reason: changes Build Source Stamp: 7519 Blamelist: fdrake,flox,jens,jim BUILD FAILED: failed test sincerely, -The Buildbot

Re: [Zope3-dev] Zope 3 as a reliable platform?!?

2006-09-07 Thread Christian Theune
Hi, Chris Withers wrote: > Christian Theune wrote: >> But changing APIs is what we do, and what we probably have to do, and >> probably keep doing. > > I would prefer to see as much of this as possible turned into the past > tense... Yup. But it isn't, yet. Unfortunately. >> However, I think, w

[Zope3-dev] Re: Re: Zope 3 as a reliable platform?!?

2006-09-07 Thread Rocky Burt
On Thu, 2006-07-09 at 08:06 +0100, Chris Withers wrote: > Martijn Faassen wrote: > > Just to give some real data on this from someone who actually spent time > > updating applications: the churn is there, but it's not like this causes > > absolutely massive amounts of work, and the deprecation wa

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Zope 3 as a reliable platform?!?

2006-09-07 Thread Lennart Regebro
On 9/5/06, Philipp von Weitershausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And therefore, we really need to make an > overview over all API changes from 3.0.0 so you can see what happened > (this in addition to the more detailed "whats new in vX" pages. > > Maybe somebody can start such a page somewhere,

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Zope 3 as a reliable platform?!?

2006-09-07 Thread Chris Withers
Martijn Faassen wrote: Just to give some real data on this from someone who actually spent time updating applications: the churn is there, but it's not like this causes absolutely massive amounts of work, and the deprecation warnings are usually pretty helpful. OK. What's your experience wi

Re: [Zope3-dev] Zope 3 as a reliable platform?!?

2006-09-07 Thread Chris Withers
Christian Theune wrote: But changing APIs is what we do, and what we probably have to do, and probably keep doing. I would prefer to see as much of this as possible turned into the past tense... However, I think, we need to get much more careful with it and maybe we can try harder keeping e

Re: [Zope3-dev] Zope 3 as a reliable platform?!?

2006-09-07 Thread Chris Withers
Stephan Richter wrote: I think at the end Jim and I agreed that the zope.* namespace should follow and keep following the current Zope 3 style guide. Other namespaces, such as zc, z3c, lovely, etc can choose their own style guide but must be consistent within the namespace. Sheesh, now you're

Re: [Zope3-dev] Zope 3 as a reliable platform?!?

2006-09-07 Thread Chris Withers
Fred Drake wrote: I don't think this paragraph really applies to this discussion. Jim suggested that we change the Z3 style guide, and I'm suggesting that that's counter-productive. Indeed, and it's an odd suggestion given that we're talking about how change for change's sake is bad ;-)