On 13.09.2007, at 18:07, Roger Ineichen wrote:
Hi
Betreff: [Zope3-dev] Re: skin support for xmlrpc
On 13.09.2007, at 17:28, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Christian Theune wrote:
Let me propose a change:
1. We revert the change.
Any news on this?
Yes. Over the last few days I
Am Freitag, den 14.09.2007, 02:49 -0400 schrieb Fred Drake:
On 9/14/07, Christian Zagrodnick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Before I'll revert the layer-support will be there in a third party
package, probably using ++api++.
Better to be specific than general when it's for a specific type of
Hi Cristian
Betreff: Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: skin support for xmlrpc
[...]
The problem is simple, XML-RPC has used the IBrowserRequest
and now it
uses the IXMLRPCRequest. This is why the XML-RPC views in different
projects don't work anymore. This means the XML-RPC uses a browser
On 14.09.2007, at 08:49, Fred Drake wrote:
On 9/14/07, Christian Zagrodnick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Before I'll revert the layer-support will be there in a third party
package, probably using ++api++.
Better to be specific than general when it's for a specific type of
request; why not
Even Girls can learn it!
Your Trainer is wolf famous Zope Tamer Philipp von Weitershausen.
September 19th - 21st (that's soon!)
for more information: http://www.lovelysystems.com/batlogg/2007/09/14/
lovely-zope3-taming/
cheers
Jodok
--
Beautiful is better than ugly.
-- The Zen of Python,
On 14.09.2007, at 11:47, Ivan Horvath wrote:
Dear Jodok,
can you also propose some accommodation for this event?
just contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] - she'll organize something for
you in case you are interested.
jodok
ps.: please contact me / maria-anna ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
directly and
Hi Jim. Fair enough. This gives me better sense of the picture. In a
year or two from now I would not be surprised to see jython at 2.5 which
could be interesting for the python frameworks. It also has a plan to
evolve to P3K as well. All python projects will get there regardless. I
am certain
Hi Fred
Betreff: Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: skin support for xmlrpc
[...]
Can't say I've ever advocated removing that, but I'm one of
those skin-means-request-type folks.
If you register views for a base request type, you
probably will open a backdor in other projects. Because
if someone uses
