Hi,
Should we create separate message factory in 'zope' domain for
each packages ? If so, can anyone explain why it should be like that.
Few weeks back a new message factory is created in
zope.i18nmessageid [1] . And now some packages use this directly.
I am bit confused now ...
[1]
I'd really like to get to closure on the current approved release
process. Philipp, would you mind separating the release process into
a separate file? Or do you mind if I do it?
Some comments on the current draft at:
http://svn.zope.org/*checkout*/Sandbox/philikon/foundation/
Jim Fulton wrote:
I'd really like to get to closure on the current approved release
process.
+1
There are other improvements that might be made, but let's not let
the perfect be the enemy of the good.
This isn't perfect, so I get to suggest it. wink
I propose that we codify the practice
On Oct 3, 2007, at 11:12 AM, Benji York wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
I'd really like to get to closure on the current approved release
process.
+1
There are other improvements that might be made, but let's not
let the perfect be the enemy of the good.
This isn't perfect, so I get to
Jim Fulton wrote:
For example, a packaging of
MochiKit 1.3.1 might have a version # like 1.3.1-1, or, if it is
exciting enough: 1.3.1-1.1
I assume setuptools interprets version numbers like this in a reasonable
way.
--
Benji York
Senior Software Engineer
Zope Corporation
On Oct 3, 2007, at 11:46 AM, Benji York wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
For example, a packaging of MochiKit 1.3.1 might have a version #
like 1.3.1-1, or, if it is exciting enough: 1.3.1-1.1
I assume setuptools interprets version numbers like this in a
reasonable way.
AFAIK. :)
Jim
--
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Tuesday 02 October 2007 17:14, Jim Fulton wrote:
One hole I see is giving people guidance on what needs to be tested
(and how) before a release is made. My preference would be to rely
heavily on judgement with a few checks so as not to make things too
heavy.
On 10/3/07, Stephan Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want tools! Actually, I just want one tool. 70% of the release process is
repetition and that needs to be factored into a tool. This tool should have
been written before the Zope trunk was blown into pieces, but it wasn't. :-(
I'd
Tres Seaver wrote:
I would prefer that we quit releasing non-source distributions at all;
the exceptions would be Windows eggs for packages containing extensions.
+1
--
Benji York
Senior Software Engineer
Zope Corporation
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
On Oct 2, 2007, at 6:52 PM, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Tuesday 02 October 2007 17:14, Jim Fulton wrote:
One hole I see is giving people guidance on what needs to be tested
(and how) before a release is made. My preference would be to rely
heavily on judgement with a few checks so as not to
On 10/3/07, Fred Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/3/07, Lennart Regebro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It currently only makes releases as tgz, but adding eggs should be so
hard (it's done by calling setup.py anyway if I remember correctly).
tgz files are all that's needed (or wanted);
On 10/3/07, Lennart Regebro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It currently only makes releases as tgz, but adding eggs should be so
hard (it's done by calling setup.py anyway if I remember correctly).
tgz files are all that's needed (or wanted); there's no reason to use
a .egg file. For packages that
Jim Fulton wrote:
I'd really like to get to closure on the current approved release
process. Philipp, would you mind separating the release process into a
separate file? Or do you mind if I do it?
Done:
http://svn.zope.org/*checkout*/Sandbox/philikon/foundation/releasing-software.txt
On Oct 3, 2007, at 3:44 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
I'd really like to get to closure on the current approved release
process. Philipp, would you mind separating the release process
into a separate file? Or do you mind if I do it?
Done:
Jim Fulton wrote:
I'd really like to get to closure on the current approved release
process. Philipp, would you mind separating the release process into
a separate file? Or do you mind if I do it?
Some comments on the current draft at:
15 matches
Mail list logo
