On Aug 23, 2007, at 8:37 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
We have 100+ packages that make up what used to be distributed as
Zope3. We have numerous more packages in svn.zope.org. Most of
them are developed, released and distributed individually. We like
to think this is a good thing
On Aug 25, 2007, at 4:59 AM, Lorenzo Gil Sanchez wrote:
Thanks for replying. I meant to make another reply but fogot.
Well, probably I was to fast predicting the causes of my problem. They
only thing I know is that a couple of months ago I could browse the
repository without any problem and
hi christian,
On 24.08.2007, at 15:12, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 24 August 2007 02:37, Christian Zagrodnick wrote:
The term skin is probably missleading but was taken to keep it
simple. It's more an api-set.
Then don't use it! Misusing a concept can lead to a lot of confusion.
it's
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 24.08.2007, 07:55 +0200 schrieb Jodok Batlogg:
hi christian,
it seems like your recent changes to support skins in xmlrpc views
introduced some troubles.
we spent several hours to debug not working xmlrpc views and finally
found that nailing the zope.traversing egg
Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 24.08.2007, 07:55 +0200 schrieb Jodok Batlogg:
hi christian,
it seems like your recent changes to support skins in xmlrpc views
introduced some troubles.
we spent several hours to debug not working xmlrpc views and finally
found that nailing the
On 27.08.2007, at 22:11, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 24.08.2007, 07:55 +0200 schrieb Jodok Batlogg:
hi christian,
it seems like your recent changes to support skins in xmlrpc views
introduced some troubles.
we spent several hours to debug not working xmlrpc views and finally
On Monday 27 August 2007 16:11, Christian Theune wrote:
1. We revert the change.
2. We create a new traverser with a different namespace that implements
our intended behaviour.
Two options after that:
3a. We supply this traverser by default, or
3b. We ship it in a separate package.
+1
On 25 Aug 2007, at 19:01 , Jim Fulton wrote:
On Aug 23, 2007, at 8:37 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
We have 100+ packages that make up what used to be distributed as
Zope3. We have numerous more packages in svn.zope.org. Most of
them are developed, released and distributed
Hi stephan
Cc: Christian Zagrodnick
Betreff: Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: skin support for xmlrpc
[...]
The idea is now to register list_foo for different
layers/skins/api-sets. This could also be achieved by
creating dummy
model-objects and/or traversers, but would be much less
Hi Jodok
Cc: Christian Zagrodnick; zope3-dev@zope.org
Betreff: Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: skin support for xmlrpc
[...]
for me xmlrpc is remote procedure call. a rpc has a signature
and always the same result. and as stephan said - traversers
should help here.
Yes, but what does this mean?
On Monday 27 August 2007 23:05, Roger Ineichen wrote:
Are you all sure you understand the need of a layer in every
kind of request? It's about permission registration and not
skinning.
If it is not about skinning, it should not be done with layers.
What I think Christian is trying to do is to
Hi all
Cc: Christian Zagrodnick
Betreff: Re: [Zope3-dev] skin support for xmlrpc
On Monday 27 August 2007 16:11, Christian Theune wrote:
1. We revert the change.
2. We create a new traverser with a different namespace that
implements
our intended behaviour.
Two options after
12 matches
Mail list logo
