On 9/29/07, Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This helps in cases where you want the configuration for a package,
but you don't want some of the configuration that it includes. This
allowed me to trim quite a bit off of the startup time, and, more
importantly, the test setup time, for a
On Oct 1, 2007, at 11:17 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Oct 1, 2007, at 11:09 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On 9/29/07, Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This helps in cases where you want the configuration for a package,
but you don't want some of the configuration that it includes. This
During the gocept sprint on z3c.form last week we found that the interface
of pagelets (z3c.pagelet.interfaces.IPagelet) is a mere marker interface
on top of IBrowserPage, which seems to me a bit thin.
For one, the implementation of pagelets makes use of the render and update
methods. Since these
On 10/1/07, Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 1, 2007, at 11:17 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Oct 1, 2007, at 11:09 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On 9/29/07, Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This helps in cases where you want the configuration for a package,
but you don't want
Hi Thomas
Betreff: [Zope3-dev] Are pagelets content providers?
During the gocept sprint on z3c.form last week we found that
the interface of pagelets (z3c.pagelet.interfaces.IPagelet)
is a mere marker interface on top of IBrowserPage, which
seems to me a bit thin.
Yes and no ;-)
I was
hey benji,
do you see a chance to use zc.testbrowser on remote (headless)
machines in combination with buildbot?
jodok
On 28.09.2007, at 16:06, Benji York wrote:
zc.testbrowser 1.0a1
I am very pleased to announce the first alpha release of
zc.testbrowser:
Christian Theune wrote:
Zagy and I are trying to make z3c.form compatible with sources.
Shrug... Why wouldn't it be compatible already? Shouldn't the widget
abstract everything away?
We had to investigate zope.schema for that and found the mess of vocabularies
and sources that is still
