On 8/29/07, srichter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
++added:
- Ensure that the setup.py has a decent set of meta-data, in particular:
* The long_description contains all doctests.
I know Jim's advocated this, at least for all documentation-centric
doctests, but I don't know that we've reached a
Am Mittwoch, den 29.08.2007, 09:58 -0400 schrieb Fred Drake:
On 8/29/07, srichter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
++added:
- Ensure that the setup.py has a decent set of meta-data, in particular:
* The long_description contains all doctests.
I know Jim's advocated this, at least for all
Previously Fred Drake wrote:
On 8/29/07, srichter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
++added:
- Ensure that the setup.py has a decent set of meta-data, in particular:
* The long_description contains all doctests.
I know Jim's advocated this, at least for all documentation-centric
doctests,
I have been following this approach with the long descriptions for my
package descriptions and believe it it a consistent and meaningful way
of communicating to a developer. It is not enough for me to see a couple
of paragraphs. The doctest text inclusion gives me an immediate answer
to what
On 8/29/07, Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't like the overly long PyPI pages, but I do really like having
easily browsable documentation online. PyPI is the only places where
that is possible at the moment.
In the absence of something better, yes, it's better than nothing at
--On 29. August 2007 16:15:36 +0200 Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I don't like the overly long PyPI pages, but I do really like having
easily browsable documentation online. PyPI is the only places where
that is possible at the moment.
Pointing people to svn.zope.org to read
