Dieter Maurer wrote:
Chris Withers wrote at 2006-9-25 18:44 +0100:
...
Can we have a papal edict that zcml that has side effects is a bug?
(including the dotted name thing...)
Hm: the purpose of zcml is to have side effects (register things,
patch classes with marker interfaces, add
Chris Withers wrote at 2006-9-25 18:44 +0100:
...
Can we have a papal edict that zcml that has side effects is a bug?
(including the dotted name thing...)
Hm: the purpose of zcml is to have side effects (register things,
patch classes with marker interfaces, add permissions, ...)
--
Dieter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Chris Withers wrote at 2006-9-25 18:44 +0100:
...
Can we have a papal edict that zcml that has side effects is a bug?
(including the dotted name thing...)
Hm: the purpose of zcml is to have side effects (register things,
On Sep 26, 2006, at 2:00 PM, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Chris Withers wrote at 2006-9-25 18:44 +0100:
...
Can we have a papal edict that zcml that has side effects is a bug?
(including the dotted name thing...)
Hm: the purpose of zcml is to have side effects (register things,
patch classes with
Jim Fulton wrote:
It would *also* require that we
implement the no side-effects during parsing policy (my other favorite
dead horse in arguments about ZCML's implementation / usage).
Beat away. :) I've been in favor of this for some time. This is
definitely a goal.
Can we have a papal
Tres Seaver wrote:
How should I do things such that they can do that?
I'm just wondering whether you really need the disabling feature.
I've wanted it. My major beef with the way we are *using* ZCML now is
that we expect package authors to provide policy-laden configuration for
their
On Sep 25, 2006, at 1:44 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
It would *also* require that we
implement the no side-effects during parsing policy (my other
favorite
dead horse in arguments about ZCML's implementation / usage).
Beat away. :) I've been in favor of this for some
On Sep 21, 2006, at 9:15 AM, Tres Seaver wrote:
I've wanted it. My major beef with the way we are *using* ZCML now is
that we expect package authors to provide policy-laden
configuration for
their packages (sensible defaults) but provide no means for the
admin
to reuse that configuration
