[Zope3-dev] Re-revisiting IResult (for in-Zope pipelining)

2007-07-13 Thread Lennart Regebro
Hi all! On 4/16/07, Gary Poster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The work that Jim Washington and David Pratt have started recently to make lxml an XHTML generator/ZPT replacement [#1]_ has really excited me. It would be *great* with in-Zope pipelines [#2]_. I'm here at the grok-sprint at EuroPytho

[Zope3-dev] Re: revisiting IResult (for in-Zope pipelining)

2007-04-16 Thread Gary Poster
On Apr 16, 2007, at 3:55 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: On 16 Apr 2007, at 19:09 , Gary Poster wrote: I suppose there are four choices: (a) special case strings to make sure they are chunked the right way; (b) expect that the adapter result will be chunked the right way, so that someo

[Zope3-dev] Re: revisiting IResult (for in-Zope pipelining)

2007-04-16 Thread Martijn Faassen
Gary Poster wrote: The work that Jim Washington and David Pratt have started recently to make lxml an XHTML generator/ZPT replacement [#1]_ has really excited me. It would be *great* with in-Zope pipelines [#2]_. A general +1() for this whole effort! I have been having some thoughts rece

[Zope3-dev] Re: revisiting IResult (for in-Zope pipelining)

2007-04-16 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
On 16 Apr 2007, at 19:09 , Gary Poster wrote: I suppose there are four choices: (a) special case strings to make sure they are chunked the right way; (b) expect that the adapter result will be chunked the right way, so that someone returning a string will get bad performance and no error mes

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: revisiting IResult (for in-Zope pipelining)

2007-04-16 Thread Jim Washington
> I'm more concretely +1 on (a) now that I've spelled out these > options. Since no one has given a true -1 on it, I will proceed with > that, unless we get further discussion. Thanks, Gary I am looking forward to using some of this! -Jim Washington ___

[Zope3-dev] Re: revisiting IResult (for in-Zope pipelining)

2007-04-16 Thread Gary Poster
On Apr 16, 2007, at 12:30 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Gary Poster wrote: Can we quickly figure out a reasonable way to make the new, improved interface ready for 3.4? I don't know if it is too late for 3.4. With the schedule Christian mentioned, it seems like it would be possible

[Zope3-dev] Re: revisiting IResult (for in-Zope pipelining)

2007-04-16 Thread Gary Poster
On Apr 16, 2007, at 12:18 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: Gary Poster wrote: The work that Jim Washington and David Pratt have started recently to make lxml an XHTML generator/ZPT replacement [#1]_ has really excited me. It would be *great* with in-Zope pipelines [#2]_. [snip] So, as

[Zope3-dev] Re: revisiting IResult (for in-Zope pipelining)

2007-04-16 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Gary Poster wrote: Can we quickly figure out a reasonable way to make the new, improved interface ready for 3.4? I don't know if it is too late for 3.4. With the schedule Christian mentioned, it seems like it would be possible. As you point out later, it doesn't make a huge difference to m

[Zope3-dev] Re: revisiting IResult (for in-Zope pipelining)

2007-04-16 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
Gary Poster wrote: The work that Jim Washington and David Pratt have started recently to make lxml an XHTML generator/ZPT replacement [#1]_ has really excited me. It would be *great* with in-Zope pipelines [#2]_. [snip] So, as a strawman, I propose that we make a public interface in zope.