Hi all!
On 4/16/07, Gary Poster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The work that Jim Washington and David Pratt have started recently to
make lxml an XHTML generator/ZPT replacement [#1]_ has really excited
me. It would be *great* with in-Zope pipelines [#2]_.
I'm here at the grok-sprint at EuroPython
Gary Poster wrote:
Can we quickly figure out a reasonable way to make the new, improved
interface ready for 3.4?
I don't know if it is too late for 3.4.
With the schedule Christian mentioned, it seems like it would be
possible. As you point out later, it doesn't make a huge difference to
On Apr 16, 2007, at 12:18 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
The work that Jim Washington and David Pratt have started recently
to make lxml an XHTML generator/ZPT replacement [#1]_ has really
excited me. It would be *great* with in-Zope pipelines [#2]_.
[snip]
So,
I'm more concretely +1 on (a) now that I've spelled out these
options. Since no one has given a true -1 on it, I will proceed with
that, unless we get further discussion.
Thanks, Gary
I am looking forward to using some of this!
-Jim Washington
On 16 Apr 2007, at 19:09 , Gary Poster wrote:
I suppose there are four choices: (a) special case strings to make
sure they are chunked the right way; (b) expect that the adapter
result will be chunked the right way, so that someone returning a
string will get bad performance and no error
Gary Poster wrote:
The work that Jim Washington and David Pratt have started recently to
make lxml an XHTML generator/ZPT replacement [#1]_ has really excited
me. It would be *great* with in-Zope pipelines [#2]_.
A general +1() for this whole effort!
I have been having some thoughts
On Apr 16, 2007, at 3:55 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
On 16 Apr 2007, at 19:09 , Gary Poster wrote:
I suppose there are four choices: (a) special case strings to make
sure they are chunked the right way; (b) expect that the adapter
result will be chunked the right way, so that
