On Aug 23, 2007, at 8:37 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
We have 100+ packages that make up what used to be distributed as
"Zope3". We have numerous more packages in svn.zope.org. Most of
them are developed, released and distributed individually. We like
to think this is a good thing
On Aug 25, 2007, at 4:59 AM, Lorenzo Gil Sanchez wrote:
Thanks for replying. I meant to make another reply but fogot.
Well, probably I was to fast predicting the causes of my problem. They
only thing I know is that a couple of months ago I could browse the
repository without any problem and s
hi christian,
On 24.08.2007, at 15:12, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 24 August 2007 02:37, Christian Zagrodnick wrote:
The term "skin" is probably missleading but was taken to keep it
simple. It's more an "api-set".
Then don't use it! Misusing a concept can lead to a lot of confusion.
i
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 24.08.2007, 07:55 +0200 schrieb Jodok Batlogg:
> hi christian,
>
> it seems like your recent changes to support skins in xmlrpc views
> introduced some troubles.
> we spent several hours to debug not working xmlrpc views and finally
> found that nailing the zope.traversing
Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 24.08.2007, 07:55 +0200 schrieb Jodok Batlogg:
hi christian,
it seems like your recent changes to support skins in xmlrpc views
introduced some troubles.
we spent several hours to debug not working xmlrpc views and finally
found that nailing the
On 27.08.2007, at 22:11, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 24.08.2007, 07:55 +0200 schrieb Jodok Batlogg:
hi christian,
it seems like your recent changes to support skins in xmlrpc views
introduced some troubles.
we spent several hours to debug not working xmlrpc views and finally
On Monday 27 August 2007 16:11, Christian Theune wrote:
> 1. We revert the change.
>
> 2. We create a new traverser with a different namespace that implements
> our intended behaviour.
>
> Two options after that:
>
> 3a. We supply this traverser by default, or
>
> 3b. We ship it in a separate pac
On 25 Aug 2007, at 19:01 , Jim Fulton wrote:
On Aug 23, 2007, at 8:37 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
We have 100+ packages that make up what used to be distributed as
"Zope3". We have numerous more packages in svn.zope.org. Most of
them are developed, released and distributed individu
Hi stephan
> Cc: Christian Zagrodnick
> Betreff: Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: skin support for xmlrpc
[...]
> > The idea is now to register list_foo for different
> > layers/skins/api-sets. This could also be achieved by
> creating dummy
> > model-objects and/or traversers, but would be much less
> u
Hi Jodok
> Cc: Christian Zagrodnick; zope3-dev@zope.org
> Betreff: Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: skin support for xmlrpc
[...]
> for me xmlrpc is remote procedure call. a rpc has a signature
> and always the same result. and as stephan said - traversers
> should help here.
Yes, but what does this mean?
On Monday 27 August 2007 23:05, Roger Ineichen wrote:
> Are you all sure you understand the need of a layer in every
> kind of request? It's about permission registration and not
> skinning.
If it is not about skinning, it should not be done with layers.
What I think Christian is trying to do is
Hi all
> Cc: Christian Zagrodnick
> Betreff: Re: [Zope3-dev] skin support for xmlrpc
>
> On Monday 27 August 2007 16:11, Christian Theune wrote:
> > 1. We revert the change.
> >
> > 2. We create a new traverser with a different namespace that
> > implements
> > our intended behaviour.
> >
> >
12 matches
Mail list logo
