On 30 Aug 2007, at 14:19 , Michael Howitz wrote:
Am 22.08.2007 um 15:53 schrieb Philipp von Weitershausen:
Michael Howitz wrote:
while looking at the dependencies of packages in the zope.*
namespace at gocept we found out that zope.sendmail depends on
zope.app.component.
Just to make sur
Previously Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> On 30 Aug 2007, at 14:19 , Michael Howitz wrote:
>
> >Am 22.08.2007 um 15:53 schrieb Philipp von Weitershausen:
> >
> >>Michael Howitz wrote:
> >>>while looking at the dependencies of packages in the zope.*
> >>>namespace at gocept we found out that
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
On 30 Aug 2007, at 14:19 , Michael Howitz wrote:
Am 22.08.2007 um 15:53 schrieb Philipp von Weitershausen:
Michael Howitz wrote:
while looking at the dependencies of packages in the zope.*
namespace
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 31.08.2007, 13:06 +0200 schrieb Wichert Akkerman:
> Is there documentation on sources anywhere? The last time I checked
> there was nothing that I could understand either in zope.* or
> on the wiki.
It took me a while to understand them myself. Especially as there is
some code
Christian Theune a écrit :
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 31.08.2007, 13:06 +0200 schrieb Wichert Akkerman:
Is there documentation on sources anywhere? The last time I checked
there was nothing that I could understand either in zope.* or
on the wiki.
It took me a while to understand them myself. Especia
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 01:21:08PM +0200, Christian Theune wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 31.08.2007, 13:06 +0200 schrieb Wichert Akkerman:
> > Is there documentation on sources anywhere? The last time I checked
> > there was nothing that I could understand either in zope.* or
> > on the wiki.
>
> It to
Am Freitag, den 31.08.2007, 14:04 +0200 schrieb Christophe Combelles:
> I was still using vocabularies, but it seems interesting, thanks for the
> explanation!
> So it basically looks like a vocabulary, with the token and title parts being
> seperated and optional.
Right, and with defaults (I tr
Hi. I am concerned about the announcement of python 3000 today that will
break backwards compatibility. Zope and twisted are my favorite
frameworks. The code base for both frameworks are not small. I haven't
evaluated the changes but I can say this is a not great day for the
python community ei
David Pratt wrote:
Hi. I am concerned about the announcement of python 3000 today that will
break backwards compatibility. Zope and twisted are my favorite
frameworks. The code base for both frameworks are not small. I haven't
evaluated the changes but I can say this is a not great day for the
On Friday 31 August 2007 20:16, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> C extensions, anyone?
That's is what I am most worried about. I really need to look into this to see
how much things changed. Maybe not as much as we tend to think.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.
On 8/31/07, Stephan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's is what I am most worried about. I really need to look into this to see
> how much things changed. Maybe not as much as we tend to think.
I think the changes will be substantial, both for Python code and for
C extensions.
A biggie is
11 matches
Mail list logo
