Re: [Zope3-dev] AdapterLookup C optimizations 'timeit' benchmarks
Ruslan Spivak wrote: Hello. For those who is interested, i created blog entry containing 'timeit' benchmarks results for Python and C versions of AdapterLookup: http://blogs.nuxeo.com/sections/blogs/ruslan_spivak/2005_08_05_adapterlookup_c There is also test script attached there. By my estimations(i hope i'm not wrong :) C version gives ~20-26% speed up for different methods. I hate to say this, but I'm working of a total redesign of the adapter management and lookup architecture. I'll evaluate it before I adopt it, but if I do, it will make your changes irrelevent. I with I knew you were working on this. Sorry. I'll be interested to look at your changes when I have time, which won't be for a few weeks. Jim -- Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered! CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Zope3-dev] AdapterLookup C optimizations 'timeit' benchmarks
Benji York wrote: Ruslan Spivak wrote: By my estimations(i hope i'm not wrong :) C version gives ~20-26% speed up for different methods. Running the functional tests for a Zope 3 based systems with 434 tests yielded (best of 3) a time of 1:12.51 for the trunk and 1:12.32 for the branch. That's about a 0.25 percent improvement. Unfortunately that doesn't seem like enough to justify the port to C. Agreed. It's curious that this had such a small impact. I haven't had a chance to to look at the changes. Jim -- Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered! CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Zope3-dev] AdapterLookup C optimizations 'timeit' benchmarks
Hello. For those who is interested, i created blog entry containing 'timeit' benchmarks results for Python and C versions of AdapterLookup: http://blogs.nuxeo.com/sections/blogs/ruslan_spivak/2005_08_05_adapterlookup_c There is also test script attached there. By my estimations(i hope i'm not wrong :) C version gives ~20-26% speed up for different methods. Regards, Ruslan a.k.a alienoid ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Zope3-dev] AdapterLookup C optimizations 'timeit' benchmarks
В Птн, 05/08/2005 в 09:46 -0400, Benji York пишет: Ruslan Spivak wrote: [...] Running the functional tests for a Zope 3 based systems with 434 tests yielded (best of 3) a time of 1:12.51 for the trunk and 1:12.32 for the branch. That's about a 0.25 percent improvement. Unfortunately that doesn't seem like enough to justify the port to C. Perhaps future work will make the improvement greater. Yes, total rewrite of Zope3 to C :) But seriously, tests were done in isolation just for method calls and that is how it should to be to get net results. If you, for example, try to run python test.py -vpu --dir src/zope/interface on the trunk and then comment importing of C version of _interface_ optimizations and rerun the tests again you'll see mainly no difference too, maybe 1.2% speed decrease. So i agree with Stephan's remarks that it may be useful, but your point is good and is worth exploring. I would really like to hear something from Jim about the issue. Ruslan ___ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
