Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Baiju M wrote:
[snip]
>
> I thought we can create individual eggs instead of a big zope.app
> egg for Zope 3.4.
Well, I don't think we have to make every single subpackage its own
egg. We should pick our battles and start with those individual eggs
that c
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
I suggest we come up with a prioritized list instead of alphabetical.
+1
> Baiju M wrote:
We can eggify all packages except those in Spring cleanup proposal [1]
Sure, we *can*, but I think it's a lot of work and we don't necessarily
have to do all of them.
Baiju M wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Baiju M wrote:
> Log message for revision 72044: Add zope.app.annotation as a
> top-level package.
>
> Changed: A zope.app.annotation/ A zope.app.annotation/branches/
> A zope.app.annotation/tags/ A zope.app.annotation/trunk/
>
> -=-
Is it rea
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Baiju M wrote:
> Log message for revision 72044: Add zope.app.annotation as a
> top-level package.
>
> Changed: A zope.app.annotation/ A zope.app.annotation/branches/
> A zope.app.annotation/tags/ A zope.app.annotation/trunk/
>
> -=-
Is it really necessary to
Baiju M wrote:
Log message for revision 72044:
Add zope.app.annotation as a top-level package.
Changed:
A zope.app.annotation/
A zope.app.annotation/branches/
A zope.app.annotation/tags/
A zope.app.annotation/trunk/
-=-
Is it really necessary to create the BBB packages in zo
