On Feb 11, 2006, at 9:24 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 10:39:52 -, Lennart Regebro
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
There are methods for neatly deprecating things like this, and they
have been employed consitently in Zope 3, and quite consistetly in
later versions of Zope
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Now I'm
told that the ZODB is the de-facto way of storing content. Maybe soon
the default may be a filesystem. Mmm...
Whatever we do with the filesystem, it's not going to be as ambitious as
Ape. Ape makes the filesystem appear as an object database, but that
turns ou
On Feb 11, 2006, at 9:24 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
I'm told that the ZODB is the de-facto way of storing content.
Maybe soon the default may be a filesystem. Mmm...
My feelings are that there should be a "classic" Zope 3 release which
is exactly what exists now (it should make the assumption
On 2/11/06, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are two types of deprecation, though - one is deprecating specific
> packages or methods or classes. Another is deprecating fundamental
> patterns and ways of working. Am I supposed to use ZCML for this or
> Python? Well, a while ago, it
