Chris Withers wrote:
> Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>> I wouldn't say that. It depends on your taste, really. I personally
>> prefer the package-includes approach for development environments; for
>> actual deployments I find having no package-includes at all, but instead
>> putting everything
Andreas Reuleaux wrote:
> If have successfully setup zope3 behind a ssl-enabled apache2 (apache
> and zope3 both running on the same host mousehouse) using ProxyPass and
> ProxyPassReverse directives as described in Philipps book in chapter 17,
> example 17.3.1, i. e. I can reach zope with https://
Igor Stroh wrote:
> Reinoud van Leeuwen wrote:
>
>>On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 09:15:42PM +0100, Florian Lindner wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I also think that pure Latex would be the best choice. It's convertible into
>>>a
>>>lot different f
Reinoud van Leeuwen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 09:15:42PM +0100, Florian Lindner wrote:
>
>>I also think that pure Latex would be the best choice. It's convertible into
>>a
>>lot different formats and can be edited just using a simple text editor.
>
>
> Isn't Docbook a better choice? Is
Michael Dudzik wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 09:07:17 +0100, "Andreas Jung"
[..]
>>>in Zope2 there's a test() method that can be used in TAL (*). Is there
>>>something comparable in Zope3?
>>>
>>>I know how to write such a method but how to make it available in the
>>>namespace of TALES-"python:"-ex
Frank Burkhardt wrote:
> in Zope2 there's a test() method that can be used in TAL (*). Is there
> something
> comparable in Zope3?
>
> I know how to write such a method but how to make it available in the
> namespace of TALES-"python:"-expressions? I would like to write expressions
> like this:
>
David Johnson wrote:
> So what is the largest ZODB (in terms of persistent objects contained in
> it)? Does anyone have any metrics?
I've got one on zope2.6.4 that's about ~30GB, it's running fine, except
that
a) It takes ages for zope to start (~15 minutes)
b) I have to mount an extra NFS volume
Hi there,
I'm trying to figure out the best way to implements a general
solution for tags (like tags on flickr or del.icio.us). So far
I've two different approaches, maybe someone could comment on
them:
1) Store the tags as attributes of the particular content types.
Searching for tagged conte
