On Thursday 23 June 2005 04:19 am, Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Saturday 18 June 2005 16:08, Corey wrote:
> > Maybe I can be of some help by going through the book using the new 3.1b
> > and make notes of whatever stuff ( code and/or text ) that could be
> > changed to better reflect the changes fro
On Saturday 18 June 2005 16:08, Corey wrote:
> Maybe I can be of some help by going through the book using the new 3.1b
> and make notes of whatever stuff ( code and/or text ) that could be changed
> to better reflect the changes from 3.0 to 3.1.
That would be great! The first task would be though
On 6/18/05, Stephan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 18 June 2005 15:19, Corey wrote:
> > Question: with all these new changes since 3.0 ( which all look very good!
> > ), approximately how much of the Zope3 Dev Book becomes
> > misleading/incorrect/obsolete? Primarily I'm wondering
On Saturday 18 June 2005 01:08 pm, Corey wrote:
> Does the online Zope3 reflect the dead-tree version?
>
Ack, my bad - looks like this is stated to not be the case right there on the
front page, sorry!
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Projects/ComponentArchitecture/FrontPage/Zope3Book
"It also
Thanks for the response, Stephan; your efforts are appreciated!
Maybe I can be of some help by going through the book using the new 3.1b and
make notes of whatever stuff ( code and/or text ) that could be changed to
better reflect the changes from 3.0 to 3.1.
Or maybe if the Zope3 Book was wik
On Saturday 18 June 2005 15:19, Corey wrote:
> Question: with all these new changes since 3.0 ( which all look very good!
> ), approximately how much of the Zope3 Dev Book becomes
> misleading/incorrect/obsolete? Primarily I'm wondering whether it is still
> possible to use the Zope3 dev book , fo
