Tres Seaver wrote:
- abort the current transaction
- sync its database connection (to pick up the changed objects)
I'm pretty sure the abort has done the sync for quite some time now...
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Withers wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
- abort the current transaction
- sync its database connection (to pick up the changed objects)
I'm pretty sure the abort has done the sync for quite some time now...
Nope, see:
Hi all,
i'm having a problem getting an InvariantsValidator working on a grouped form
using z3c.form. Imagine the following setup:
class GroupOne(Group):
fields = Fields(IMyForm).select('second_attribute', 'third_attribute')
class GroupTwo(Group):
fields =
Malthe,
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 19:57 +0300, Malthe Borch wrote:
Code snippet:
def open(self, url, data=None):
See zope.testbrowser.interfaces.IBrowser
url = str(url)
This string coercion is unfortunate, because ``mechanize`` accepts a
(mechanize-) request-object in
2009/3/18 Christian Theune c...@gocept.com:
Did this get resolved by any means? As it didn't spur any discussion at
all, you might want to at least file a bug tracker issue for that
problem.
It has now been filed as https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope3/+bug/344680.
\malthe
Hi,
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 04:18 +0300, Dan Korostelev wrote:
2009/3/5 Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com:
Chris Withers wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
I think we can only make the correct determination if we get an idea of
the performance implications. If it turns out the C code
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 10:50 -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Malthe Borch wrote:
2009/3/10 Fred Drake fdr...@gmail.com:
The change would need to be in zope.tal.
True.
I'm ambivalent; while it makes sense to me in isolation, the affect on
2009/3/18 Christian Theune c...@gocept.com:
I'm not sure how to time the move, though. One option would be to
release a bugfix with the option as non-default and a feature release
with the option as default.
That's a good approach.
What kind of configuration should enable it; an environment
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 10:55 +0300, Malthe Borch wrote:
2009/3/18 Christian Theune c...@gocept.com:
I'm not sure how to time the move, though. One option would be to
release a bugfix with the option as non-default and a feature release
with the option as default.
That's a good approach.
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 17:27 +0100, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hi there,
Stephan Richter wrote:
[snip]
In my opinion going for an extra here just to avoid this is speculating
a bit too much right now. Do we really have users that want to use
zope.password and really don't want zope.component
2009/3/18 Roger Ineichen d...@projekt01.ch:
This means to me that an empty value for id or name
doen't start with [A-Za-z] and is invalid because is must start
with [A-Za-z]. or not?
Correct, but should enforce these requirements? I think ZPT should
just have predictable, expected behavior,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roger Ineichen wrote:
Hi Malthe
Betreff: [Zope-dev] ZPT attributes and
Currently, if an attribute expression evaluates to any value
that's boolean False, it's omitted (e.g. 0, , object()). I
think that's unexpected. Instead, attributes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Theune wrote:
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 17:27 +0100, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hi there,
Stephan Richter wrote:
[snip]
In my opinion going for an extra here just to avoid this is speculating
a bit too much right now. Do we really have users
Hi Malthe
Betreff: [Zope-dev] ZPT attributes and
Currently, if an attribute expression evaluates to any value
that's boolean False, it's omitted (e.g. 0, , object()). I
think that's unexpected. Instead, attributes should only be
omitted when the expression evaluates to ``None``.
I
Hi Tres
Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] ZPT attributes and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roger Ineichen wrote:
Hi Malthe
Betreff: [Zope-dev] ZPT attributes and
Currently, if an attribute expression evaluates to any
value that's
boolean False, it's omitted
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Tue Mar 17 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Wed Mar 18 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Tue Mar 17 21:23:50 EDT 2009
URL:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
When using paste.httpserver instead of twisted.wsgi server
zope.publisher.xmlrpc.XMLRPCRequest.processInputs() hangs when reading 0
Bytes from the request (wsgi.input socket._fileobject object).
As i found the
Hi.
Chris Withers wrote:
Got zope.interface 3.5.1.
Any chance someone could roll and release a Windows binary egg for this?
I just uploaded binary Windows eggs for Python 2.4, 2.5 and 2.6.
Hanno
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
Hi Michael
Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] XML-RPC does not work under the paster process
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
When using paste.httpserver instead of twisted.wsgi server
zope.publisher.xmlrpc.XMLRPCRequest.processInputs() hangs
when
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Roger Ineichen d...@projekt01.ch wrote:
As far as I know it is valid to skip attributes for empty values
but for some attributes it is not valid to use empty values.
Let's not use the term valid in this context, as it's pretty overloaded here.
In the general
Christian Theune wrote:
I remember that at the sprint we used to identify packages which are
always good. E.g. zope.interface is a declared no-brainer to add to
your dependencies. The other two that keep popping up that we *might*
wanna white-list are zope.schema and zope.component.
To
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 07:31:36AM -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
Roger Ineichen wrote:
Hi Malthe
Betreff: [Zope-dev] ZPT attributes and
Currently, if an attribute expression evaluates to any value
that's boolean False, it's omitted (e.g. 0, , object()).
object() is true in boolean
22 matches
Mail list logo
