Hi,
I hope it's not considered "bad form" to answer ones
own questions on this board, but I think I've got it
sussed.
Reading through the ZWiki source from
http://svn.zope.org I noticed the following line in
the implementations:
from zope.app.container.contained import Contained
I added this t
Hello again,
So, following the recommendations from the board I
have settled on "route 3" - developing a Python
Product, using Zope 3. I've been refering a lot to the
Zope 3 Book (particularly chapter 13 onwards) and have
progressed somewhat.
I've created a "PropertyFolder" class, which can hold
On 22.Jun 2005 - 09:52:23, Paul Winkler wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 02:02:30PM +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > No, method 2 aka ZClasses don't involve producing a Product.
>
> Sure it does. A ZClass-based Product is still a Product.
Can't remember to have created a product, but then this
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 02:02:30PM +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> No, method 2 aka ZClasses don't involve producing a Product.
Sure it does. A ZClass-based Product is still a Product.
As for why I don't use ZClasses:
1) Doing everything in "restricted" mode is a big pain.
You end up writing a
On 22.Jun 2005 - 12:04:02, Jim Vine wrote:
> > On 21.Jun 2005 - 21:59:41, Jim Vine wrote:
> > > Say, for example that my Zope App in some way has
> > a
> > > "House" object, which records the address, the
> > owner,
> > > and a short description. Later on, I may wish to
> > add
> > > further fields
Hi Jim,
Jim Vine wrote:
> I’d greatly appreciate any guidance that can be
> provided on these subjects.
>
I know a lot has been said since your original query, but re-reading it
I was surprised that no one had asked a fundamental question: -
"If the data is structured in nature and fits the rel
On 6/22/05, Jim Vine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I've convinced myself that the complexity of
> my app takes it beyond method 1, but I'm strugling to
> get my head around the implications of selecting
> method 2 or 3. Am I right in thinking that either of
> these will result in my building
> On 21.Jun 2005 - 21:59:41, Jim Vine wrote:
> > Say, for example that my Zope App in some way has
> a
> > "House" object, which records the address, the
> owner,
> > and a short description. Later on, I may wish to
> add
> > further fields to record, say, the number of
> bedrooms,
> > but the syst
On 6/21/05, Jim Vine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> but the Zope Book (2.7 version)'s chapter on Creating
> a Basic Application all seems to be through the ZMI.
Unfortunately is the correct word there.
> Now, Zope's original appeal to me was using the
> graphical interface provided by the ZMI to cr
On 21.Jun 2005 - 21:59:41, Jim Vine wrote:
> Say, for example that my Zope App in some way has a
> "House" object, which records the address, the owner,
> and a short description. Later on, I may wish to add
> further fields to record, say, the number of bedrooms,
> but the system is already in use
Thanks to those who posted suggestions - certainly
gave me a few things to think about. Unfortunately I
was left with one "use Zope 2", one "use Zope 3" and a
"use Plone", but maybe that's just a reflection of the
fact that there's more than one Zope way to skin a
cat! (yeah, I know I've over-simpl
On 16.Jun 2005 - 23:17:43, Jim Vine wrote:
> Specifically, I've been scratching my head for a while
> about how to handle a many-many relationship: a
> property owner may own more than one house;
> conversely, a house may have more than one co-owner -
> consequently it's not appropriate to have eit
On 6/17/05, Jim Vine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm very interested in the Object Oriented way of
> doing things; for example, I'm thinking about
> implementing houses as a folder-ish object, so it
> would be able to contain photos of the house in
> question. The biggest stumbling block I am faci
13 matches
Mail list logo
