The proposal to merge lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_bug_962255 into lp:zorba has
been updated.
Status: Approved => Merged
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_bug_962255/+merge/105989
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_bug_962255/+merge/1
Validation queue job fix_bug_962255-2012-05-18T15-42-06.591Z is finished. The
final status was:
All tests succeeded!
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_bug_962255/+merge/105989
Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba.
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~z
Validation queue starting for merge proposal.
Log at:
http://zorbatest.lambda.nu:8080/remotequeue/fix_bug_962255-2012-05-18T15-42-06.591Z/log.html
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_bug_962255/+merge/105989
Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba.
--
Mailing l
The proposal to merge lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_bug_962255 into lp:zorba has
been updated.
Status: Needs review => Approved
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_bug_962255/+merge/105989
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_bug_962255/+m
Review: Approve
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_bug_962255/+merge/105989
Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba.
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders
Post to : zorba-coders@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~zorba
The proposal to merge lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_bug_962255 into lp:zorba has
been updated.
Status: Approved => Needs review
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_bug_962255/+merge/105989
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_bug_962255/+m
The attempt to merge lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_bug_962255 into lp:zorba
failed. Below is the output from the failed tests.
CMake Error at /home/ceej/zo/testing/zorbatest/tester/TarmacLander.cmake:274
(message):
Validation queue job fix_bug_962255-2012-05-18T14-34-05.391Z is finished.
The f
Validation queue starting for merge proposal.
Log at:
http://zorbatest.lambda.nu:8080/remotequeue/fix_bug_962255-2012-05-18T14-34-05.391Z/log.html
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_bug_962255/+merge/105989
Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba.
--
Mailing l
The proposal to merge lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_bug_962255 into lp:zorba has
been updated.
Status: Needs review => Approved
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_bug_962255/+merge/105989
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_bug_962255/+m
Review: Approve
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_bug_962255/+merge/105989
Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba.
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders
Post to : zorba-coders@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~zorba
Review: Approve
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_bug_962255/+merge/105989
Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba.
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders
Post to : zorba-coders@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~zorba
I'm a bit confused then... I thought the whole point of this exercise was to
ensure that the graph was regenerated every time. But with the dependencies the
way you say, the modules_svg target will only ever be executed by hand. Am I
missing something?
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coder
Review: Needs Fixing
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_bug_962255/+merge/105989
Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba.
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders
Post to : zorba-coders@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~
> Ok, I have added the changes discussed. xqdoc now depends on modules_svg
> (Sorin, you had it the other way around, but I think this is what you meant).
> modules_svg will be a dummy target if the Graphviz modules is not declared. If
> it is declared, it will generate the .svg file.
Nope, the way
Review: Approve
Ok, I have added the changes discussed. xqdoc now depends on modules_svg
(Sorin, you had it the other way around, but I think this is what you meant).
modules_svg will be a dummy target if the Graphviz modules is not declared. If
it is declared, it will generate the .svg file.
The proposal to merge lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_bug_962255 into lp:zorba has
been updated.
Description changed to:
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_bug_962255/+merge/105989
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_bug_962255/+merge/105989
The proposal to merge lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_bug_962255 into lp:zorba has
been updated.
Commit Message changed to:
Update modules_svg generation target. Add mechanism for core build to detect
whether a given non-core module exists (by URI). Use that method to check for
graphviz before gene
> > Is there any difference between the old zorba_module_dependencies.xqi and
> the
> > new zorba_module_dependencies.xqy ? Why was the filename changed?
> The module itself was mostly re-written, but the reason for the extension
> change is XQDT: xqy is not a default extension for XQuery, while xq
Ok, so as discussed, the reason you moved the modules_svg target and associated
dependencies was because you could not otherwise know whether Graphviz was
available.
If so, then please do the following:
1. Change this fix_bug_962255 branch to always create the modules_svg target
(as it appears
> Is there any difference between the old zorba_module_dependencies.xqi and the
> new zorba_module_dependencies.xqy ? Why was the filename changed?
The module itself was mostly re-written, but the reason for the extension
change is XQDT: xqy is not a default extension for XQuery, while xqi is.
--
> Is there any difference between the old zorba_module_dependencies.xqi and the
> new zorba_module_dependencies.xqy ? Why was the filename changed?
>
> Besides that, though, as mentioned on the other merge proposal, I don't think
> you can move the modules_svg target out of the core like this.
Wha
Is there any difference between the old zorba_module_dependencies.xqi and the
new zorba_module_dependencies.xqy ? Why was the filename changed?
Besides that, though, as mentioned on the other merge proposal, I don't think
you can move the modules_svg target out of the core like this.
--
https:/
The proposal to merge lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_bug_962255 into lp:zorba has
been updated.
Commit Message changed to:
Partial fix for lp:962255.
Branch lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_bug_962255_image_module is the other part of
the fix.
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-cod
Review: Approve
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_bug_962255/+merge/105989
Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba.
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders
Post to : zorba-coders@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~zorba
24 matches
Mail list logo
