Re: [Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/feature-node_copy into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Markos Zaharioudakis
Review: Needs Fixing -- https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/feature-node_copy/+merge/97562 Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders Post to : zorba-coders@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe :

Re: [Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/feature-node_copy into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Markos Zaharioudakis
The function should be marked as a map and as propagating-input-nodes. Also, the must-copy-input-nodes property is not alwayts tree. It is true if the preserve mode is no-preserve. In general, I admit that must-copy-input-nodes is not a good name for this property; it should be called

[Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/phpapi into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread William Candillon
William Candillon has proposed merging lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/phpapi into lp:zorba. Requested reviews: Matthias Brantner (matthias-brantner) For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/phpapi/+merge/97612 Minor update on the PHP example page. --

Re: [Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/phpapi into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Matthias Brantner
Review: Approve -- https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/phpapi/+merge/97612 Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders Post to : zorba-coders@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders

[Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/bug-analyze_string into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Matthias Brantner
Matthias Brantner has proposed merging lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/bug-analyze_string into lp:zorba. Requested reviews: Paul J. Lucas (paul-lucas) Markos Zaharioudakis (markos-za) For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/bug-analyze_string/+merge/97671 proper return

[Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/bug-analyze_string into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Matthias Brantner
The proposal to merge lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/bug-analyze_string into lp:zorba has been updated. Status: Needs review = Approved For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/bug-analyze_string/+merge/97671 --

[Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/bug-analyze_string into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Zorba Build Bot
Validation queue starting for merge proposal. Log at: http://zorbatest.lambda.nu:8080/remotequeue/bug-analyze_string-2012-03-15T15-01-13.07Z/log.html -- https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/bug-analyze_string/+merge/97671 Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba. --

Re: [Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/bug-analyze_string into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Paul J. Lucas
Why isn't code-generation improved so it *can* be done via code-generation instead? -- https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/bug-analyze_string/+merge/97671 Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders Post to :

Re: [Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/bug-analyze_string into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Paul J. Lucas
Why isn't code-generation improved so it *can* be done via code-generation instead? Automatic code-generation is going to be even more important (and necessary) in light of the forthcoming LLVM stuff. There's going to be even more code that ought to be generated automatically, e.g., C

Re: [Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~nbrinza/zorba/parse-fragment into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Nicolae Brinza
I have fixed the failing test, which apparently fails only in the Release build. -- https://code.launchpad.net/~nbrinza/zorba/parse-fragment/+merge/97292 Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders Post to :

[Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/bug-analyze_string into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Zorba Build Bot
Validation queue job bug-analyze_string-2012-03-15T15-01-13.07Z is finished. The final status was: All tests succeeded! -- https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/bug-analyze_string/+merge/97671 Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba. -- Mailing list:

Re: [Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/bug-analyze_string into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Zorba Build Bot
Voting does not meet specified criteria. Required: Approve 1, Disapprove 1, Needs Fixing 1, Pending 1. Got: 3 Pending. -- https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/bug-analyze_string/+merge/97671 Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba. -- Mailing list:

[Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~nbrinza/zorba/parse-fragment into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Nicolae Brinza
The proposal to merge lp:~nbrinza/zorba/parse-fragment into lp:zorba has been updated. Status: Needs review = Approved For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~nbrinza/zorba/parse-fragment/+merge/97292 -- https://code.launchpad.net/~nbrinza/zorba/parse-fragment/+merge/97292 Your

[Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/bug-analyze_string into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Zorba Build Bot
The proposal to merge lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/bug-analyze_string into lp:zorba has been updated. Status: Approved = Needs review For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/bug-analyze_string/+merge/97671 --

Re: [Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~nbrinza/zorba/parse-fragment into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Zorba Build Bot
There are additional revisions which have not been approved in review. Please seek review and approval of these new revisions. -- https://code.launchpad.net/~nbrinza/zorba/parse-fragment/+merge/97292 Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba. -- Mailing list:

[Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~nbrinza/zorba/parse-fragment into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Zorba Build Bot
The proposal to merge lp:~nbrinza/zorba/parse-fragment into lp:zorba has been updated. Status: Approved = Needs review For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~nbrinza/zorba/parse-fragment/+merge/97292 -- https://code.launchpad.net/~nbrinza/zorba/parse-fragment/+merge/97292 Your

[Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~nbrinza/zorba/parse-fragment into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Nicolae Brinza
The proposal to merge lp:~nbrinza/zorba/parse-fragment into lp:zorba has been updated. Status: Needs review = Approved For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~nbrinza/zorba/parse-fragment/+merge/97681 -- https://code.launchpad.net/~nbrinza/zorba/parse-fragment/+merge/97681 Your

Re: [Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~nbrinza/zorba/parse-fragment into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread William Candillon
Review: Approve -- https://code.launchpad.net/~nbrinza/zorba/parse-fragment/+merge/97681 Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders Post to : zorba-coders@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe :

Re: [Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/bug-analyze_string into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Matthias Brantner
Why isn't code-generation improved so it *can* be done via code-generation instead? There are plenty of cases to specify the user-defined types. Handling each of them automatically (i.e. generate the correct create_* function call to create the type) is not worth it for the 2 functions that we

Re: [Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/bug-analyze_string into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Matthias Brantner
Why isn't code-generation improved so it *can* be done via code-generation instead? Automatic code-generation is going to be even more important (and necessary) in light of the forthcoming LLVM stuff. There's going to be even more code that ought to be generated automatically, e.g., C

Re: [Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~nbrinza/zorba/parse-fragment into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Matthias Brantner
Review: Approve -- https://code.launchpad.net/~nbrinza/zorba/parse-fragment/+merge/97681 Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders Post to : zorba-coders@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe :

[Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~nbrinza/zorba/parse-fragment into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Nicolae Brinza
The proposal to merge lp:~nbrinza/zorba/parse-fragment into lp:zorba has been updated. Status: Approved = Needs review For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~nbrinza/zorba/parse-fragment/+merge/97681 -- https://code.launchpad.net/~nbrinza/zorba/parse-fragment/+merge/97681 Your

[Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~nbrinza/zorba/parse-fragment into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Nicolae Brinza
The proposal to merge lp:~nbrinza/zorba/parse-fragment into lp:zorba has been updated. Status: Needs review = Approved For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~nbrinza/zorba/parse-fragment/+merge/97681 -- https://code.launchpad.net/~nbrinza/zorba/parse-fragment/+merge/97681 Your

Re: [Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~nbrinza/zorba/parse-fragment into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Nicolae Brinza
It seems the remote queue is stuck again, probably because I have approved it before anyone else. I'll resubmit. -- https://code.launchpad.net/~nbrinza/zorba/parse-fragment/+merge/97681 Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba. -- Mailing list:

Re: [Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_warnings_fedora into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Sorin Marian Nasoi
Review: Approve -- https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_warnings_fedora/+merge/97705 Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders Post to : zorba-coders@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe :

Re: [Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_warnings_fedora into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Matthias Brantner
The PROJECT_NAMES need to be quoted because they contain spaces. That is, Zorba C-API. -- https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_warnings_fedora/+merge/97705 Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders Post to :

[Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Sorin Marian Nasoi
Sorin Marian Nasoi has proposed merging lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix into lp:zorba. Requested reviews: Zorba Coders (zorba-coders) Sorin Marian Nasoi (sorin.marian.nasoi) For more details, see:

Re: [Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Sorin Marian Nasoi
Review: Approve -- https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix/+merge/97708 Your team Zorba Coders is requested to review the proposed merge of lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix into lp:zorba. -- Mailing list:

[Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Sorin Marian Nasoi
You have been requested to review the proposed merge of lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix into lp:zorba. For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix/+merge/97708 Fixed a namespace clash by adding a -schema to the

Re: [Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_warnings_fedora into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread William Candillon
Works great for me. -- https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_warnings_fedora/+merge/97705 Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders Post to : zorba-coders@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe :

Re: [Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_warnings_fedora into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Sorin Marian Nasoi
Works great for me. It still needs one more Approve to be merged :). -- https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_warnings_fedora/+merge/97705 Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders Post to :

Re: [Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_warnings_fedora into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Matthias Brantner
Review: Approve -- https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_warnings_fedora/+merge/97705 Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders Post to : zorba-coders@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe :

[Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_warnings_fedora into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Matthias Brantner
The proposal to merge lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_warnings_fedora into lp:zorba has been updated. Status: Needs review = Approved For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_warnings_fedora/+merge/97705 --

Re: [Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fn_envvars into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Juan Zacarias
- the unparsed-text-lines function doesn't really stream because it materializes all the lines in a vector before returning them. Instead, the iterator should keep the istream in it's state and return the lines as they are parsed from the stream. Just one question about this, the Item returned

[Zorba-coders] [Bug 956318] [NEW] Make sure modules (external and internal) are uniform

2012-03-15 Thread Sorin Marian Nasoi
Public bug reported: We should make sure the modules (and schemas used in them) are named with the SAME pattern. See thread: https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=enfromgroups#!topic /zorba-dev/S10aasc-tnA ** Affects: zorba Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this

[Zorba-coders] [Bug 956347] [NEW] Extend XQXQ module functionality by exposing the prolog

2012-03-15 Thread Sorin Marian Nasoi
Public bug reported: adding the following two functions to the XQXQ module should allow for an arbitrary static context to be set up as required (e.g. declaring namespaces, enabling the hof option, ...). Hence, it should not be required anymore to make changes to the original query. declare

Re: [Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fn_envvars into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Matthias Brantner
- the unparsed-text-lines function doesn't really stream because it materializes all the lines in a vector before returning them. Instead, the iterator should keep the istream in it's state and return the lines as they are parsed from the stream. Just one question about this, the Item

Re: [Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Chris Hillery
Review: Approve The change looks good. One question: is using the same prefix that the original module used likely to cause any conflicts? Are those prefixes generally unique as well as the module prefixes? --

[Zorba-coders] [Bug 956460] [NEW] Zorba FOTS driver: assert-serialization bug

2012-03-15 Thread Sorin Marian Nasoi
Public bug reported: Matthias mentioned that a test which has an obviously wrong expected result (assert-serialization![CDATA[foobar]]/assert-serialization) but isn't shown as failing. ** Affects: zorba Importance: Medium Assignee: Sorin Marian Nasoi (sorin.marian.nasoi)

Re: [Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Sorin Marian Nasoi
The change looks good. One question: is using the same prefix that the original module used likely to cause any conflicts? Are those prefixes generally unique as well as the module prefixes? I think that that is what Dana meant by suggesting uniformity: as a result I have added bug lp:956318.

[Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Chris Hillery
The proposal to merge lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix into lp:zorba has been updated. Status: Needs review = Approved For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix/+merge/97708 --

Re: [Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Chris Hillery
Sounds reasonable. -- https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix/+merge/97708 Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders Post to : zorba-coders@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe :

Re: [Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Matthias Brantner
Review: Needs Information Does this also work for schema imports without a prefix? -- https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix/+merge/97708 Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders Post to

[Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Zorba Build Bot
Validation queue starting for merge proposal. Log at: http://zorbatest.lambda.nu:8080/remotequeue/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix-2012-03-15T21-48-35.202Z/log.html -- https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix/+merge/97708 Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to

Re: [Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Zorba Build Bot
The attempt to merge lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix into lp:zorba failed. Below is the output from the failed tests. CMake Error at /home/ceej/zo/testing/zorbatest/tester/TarmacLander.cmake:274 (message): Validation queue job

[Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Zorba Build Bot
The proposal to merge lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix into lp:zorba has been updated. Status: Approved = Needs review For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix/+merge/97708 --

Re: [Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Sorin Marian Nasoi
Does this also work for schema imports without a prefix? Are you referring to: import schema default element namespace SOMETHING; ? The answer would be no, the current changes are not tested for this because we have no modules at this point using this kind of schema imports. The xqdoc printer

Re: [Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Sorin Marian Nasoi
Review: Approve -- https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix/+merge/97708 Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders Post to : zorba-coders@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe :

Re: [Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Matthias Brantner
Does this also work for schema imports without a prefix? Are you referring to: import schema default element namespace SOMETHING; ? The answer would be no, the current changes are not tested for this because we have no modules at this point using this kind of schema imports. The xqdoc

Re: [Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Sorin Marian Nasoi
Does this also work for schema imports without a prefix? Are you referring to: import schema default element namespace SOMETHING; ? The answer would be no, the current changes are not tested for this because we have no modules at this point using this kind of schema imports. The

Re: [Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Dana Florescu
Yes, that's what I mean. It looks like the xqdoc visitor could crash with this change. That's why I think the branch shouldn't be merged before it's tested. Nope, I disagree: this merge does not introduce the problem you mentioned because it was already there :) I agree with Sorin. The

Re: [Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~nbrinza/zorba/parse-fragment into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Matthias Brantner
Review: Approve -- https://code.launchpad.net/~nbrinza/zorba/parse-fragment/+merge/97701 Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zorba-coders Post to : zorba-coders@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe :

[Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~nbrinza/zorba/parse-fragment into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Matthias Brantner
The proposal to merge lp:~nbrinza/zorba/parse-fragment into lp:zorba has been updated. Commit Message changed to: Fully streaming parse-xml module. For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~nbrinza/zorba/parse-fragment/+merge/97701 --

[Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Matthias Brantner
The proposal to merge lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix into lp:zorba has been updated. Status: Needs review = Approved For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix/+merge/97708 --

[Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Zorba Build Bot
Validation queue starting for merge proposal. Log at: http://zorbatest.lambda.nu:8080/remotequeue/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix-2012-03-16T02-46-08.694Z/log.html -- https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix/+merge/97708 Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to

[Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread Zorba Build Bot
Validation queue job fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix-2012-03-16T02-46-08.694Z is finished. The final status was: All tests succeeded! -- https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix/+merge/97708 Your team Zorba Coders is subscribed to branch lp:zorba. --

[Zorba-coders] [Merge] lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix into lp:zorba

2012-03-15 Thread noreply
The proposal to merge lp:~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix into lp:zorba has been updated. Status: Approved = Merged For more details, see: https://code.launchpad.net/~zorba-coders/zorba/fix_xqdoc_schema_import_prefix/+merge/97708 --