Re: Sendmail Weirdness, Or Welcome to WinHat 7.1

[Vladimir G Ivanovic]

1. Uncomment the DAEMON_OPTIONS line. 
2. Comment out the FEATURE(accept_unresolvable_domains') line.

I don't know of any security exploits that this configuration exposes me
to. If there are, then this is obviously NOT a suitable starting point,
and my previous postings on this topic would be wrong.

--- Vladimir

Vladimir G. Ivanovic                    http://www.leonora.org/~vladimir
2770 Cowper St.                                         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Palo Alto, CA 94306-2447                                 +1 650 678 8014

"FLR" == Florian La Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

  FLR> On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 10:15:28AM -0700, Vladimir G Ivanovic wrote:
  >> My impression is that RH has gone overboard in their attempt to secure
  >> `sendmail'. A working `sendmail' does not imply an insecure system.
  >> There is a middle ground that results in a working mail system and a
  >> secure system *without* any additional configuration on the part of a
  >> sysadmin.

  FLR> I'd be interested in seeing a proposal of what you would like to
  FLR> have as sendmail configuration. I might add such examples into the
  FLR> src.rpm, so that others can start from them to configure their local
  FLR> system.

  FLR> Thanks,

  FLR> Florian La Roche



_______________________________________________
Seawolf-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list