On Monday 16 July 2001 11:08, Chuck Mead wrote:
> * John Moretti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > THANK YOU Chuck!
> > You literally read my mind :-)
> > The thread is silly. Yes it is. RH has always been bitched at for
> > being not "secure per default" enough, and now that things get a
> > littler tighter there's massive complaining.
> >
> > I might agree with doc, that it should be slightly more documented
> > (even though reading the RELEASE-NOTES is a must always.) just as
> > the massive libwrap usage should have been publicized a bit more as
> > well. But still this is the RIGHT way to go.
>
> The thing is it's not happening just in this thread or just on this
> list... the complaints are everywhere and just as stupid each time
> they arise... Red Hat is doing the right thing and they've
> responded to their critics in a very valid way... now if a veteran
> claiming to be an expert wants to criticize them then why not
> criticize something that was/is not a response/improvement to
> previous criticism (though frankly *I* am so happy with seawolf I
> don't know what that would be).
Maybe people should be directed to Red Hat's "7.1 Gotchas" page:
http://www.redhat.com/support/docs/gotchas/7.1/gotchas-71.html
Chris
_______________________________________________
Seawolf-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list
