On Wed, 2001-10-03 at 14:29, Erik Troan wrote: > On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Harry Putnam wrote: > It's not done because we're understaffed, and just haven't had time. We > agree that it should be done, fwiw. >
Eric, This may open up another can of worms, but I'll ask anyway. Is there a procedure for people to submit documention changes back to redhat? Usually I ream the developers for shipping a shoddy product, but since linux is much more of a communal process...I guess we should all give a little back. If I need to figure a script out, then I'm going to figure it out with or without documention. I may as well add some comments during the process so the next schmuck can have some help. Is there a channel/review process for submitting this back to redhat, it's not a bug really, more of an enhancement. I suppose you could make the argument that if someone has the time to review every change we(I) submit, then they might have time to comment it themselves? Anyway, just curious. I personally don't find the scripts all that unintelligble but I suppose someone new to unix or linux might. --Chris -- Christopher Keller Systems Engineer BeamReach Networks -- Sunnyvale, CA _______________________________________________ Seawolf-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list
