On 3 Oct 2001, Christopher Keller wrote: > This may open up another can of worms, but I'll ask anyway. Is there a > procedure for people to submit documention changes back to redhat? > Usually I ream the developers for shipping a shoddy product, but since > linux is much more of a communal process...I guess we should all give a > little back.
Bugzilla, bugzilla, bugzilla. Folks are really good about adding taking patches from there if they are done properly. Make the change, generate a patch, and attach it to the bug. It will almost definitely get added. > I suppose you could make the argument that if someone has the time to > review every change we(I) submit, then they might have time to comment > it themselves? Not at all -- if the docs are wrong, they'll probably get ignored. But it's quick to see if someone got the right idea or not. Trying to write something intelligable is not. Erik ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | "Who is John Galt?" - Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand | | | | Linux Application Development -- http://people.redhat.com/johnsonm/lad | _______________________________________________ Seawolf-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list
