-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 15 Oct 2001, rpjday wrote:

> it's been like that for several days now, which is starting to get a
> bit tiring.  roswell was taken off-line several days ago, which is
> normally a good indication that the real thing will soon be available.
> 
> the date on both the (now inaccessible) roswell directory and the 7.2
> directory is oct 5 -- a full 10 days ago.  yes, yes, i know the party
> line -- we don't pre-announce ... etc, etc.  but i figure it's about
> time for red hat to move one way or the other.
> 
> this is now officially beyond playfully coy, and into moderately
> annoying.

        You know, it's funny...  When RH releases a new version with 
little or no lead time people complain that it wasn't tested enough or 
that there wasn't enough time for the mirrors to get everything and how 
hard it is to d/l because there's no access.  Now it seems like they 
might be trying to make sure that all the mirrors are ready and that the 
release is completely settled and people are bitching about that.

        Damned if they do and damned if they don't, huh?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7zxuRHeWRPx8OIHARAifCAJ4sCGqRfvvx/cwx+IgKsE4whCtg9gCbBkh5
NUj8ixJZATqGTzTsSvD3hao=
=2JYl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



_______________________________________________
Seawolf-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list

Reply via email to