On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 23:31:13 GMT, Jamil Nimeh <jni...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I don't think there's any reason why we could use a >> Collection<SSLSocketTemplate.Cert> for these. I'll try switching to that. > > Xuelei, I went back and looked at my rationale for using Strings here. The > reason I went with this approach was so I could have client and server > parameter maps of <ParamType, String>. I had a common form for parameters > that I'd want to set/reset/change between each type of test run. If I were > to go with something like a Collection<SSLSocketTemplate.Cert> then my client > and server parameter maps would end up needing to be <ParamType, Object> and > then I'd have to cast based on the param type. Not sure if changing from the > Strings ends up being more clear int the long run. No problem, using String is ok to me. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1197
