> The current syntax of the jdk.tls.disabledAlgorithms makes it difficult to 
> disable algorithms that affect both the key exchange and authentication parts 
> of a TLS cipher suite. For example, if you add "RSA" to the 
> jdk.tls.disabledAlgorithms security property, it disables all cipher suites 
> that use RSA, whether it is for key exchange or authentication. If you only 
> want to disable cipher suites that use RSA for key exchange, the only 
> workaround is to list the whole cipher suite name, so an exact match is done, 
> but if there are many cipher suites that use that key exchange algorithm, 
> this becomes cumbersome.

Artur Barashev has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes 
brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 25 additional commits 
since the last revision:

 - Use atomic computeIfAbsent. Add more cipher suites to test.
 - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8341964_regex
 - - Cache the patterns
   - Make matching case-sensitive
   - Update java.security documentation
   - Refactor the tests
 - "Cipher suites must start with TLS_" doc update
 - Update doc
 - Update the doc
 - DisabledAlgorithmConstraints already caches the results of checkAlgorithm 
call
 - Add cache of the wildcard matching results
 - Make matching case-insensitive. Compact the code.
 - 8341964: Add mechanism to disable different parts of TLS cipher suite
 - ... and 15 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/a7bf4d4a...98753b23

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21841/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21841/files/fa693cb4..98753b23

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=21841&range=04
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=21841&range=03-04

  Stats: 193673 lines in 1870 files changed: 120776 ins; 51171 del; 21726 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21841.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21841/head:pull/21841

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21841

Reply via email to