On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 22:33:46 GMT, Bradford Wetmore <wetm...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> The example code in the JEP was much clearer than that in the current `KEM` >> class. It's easier to keep the various nested classes straight, rather than >> using `var`s which require scrolling to see what the return types are. >> >> Added/tweaked example for clarity. >> >> Generated/checked javadocs, but no regression/JCK tests is necessary. > > Bradford Wetmore has updated the pull request incrementally with one > additional commit since the last revision: > > Further codereview Comments from Weijun LGTM. Thanks! ------------- Marked as reviewed by weijun (Reviewer). PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23652#pullrequestreview-2619504934
