On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 18:34:00 GMT, Francisco Ferrari Bihurriet 
<fferr...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Valerie Peng has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
>> commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   apply the suggested changes and minor code refactoring.
>
> src/jdk.crypto.cryptoki/share/classes/sun/security/pkcs11/P11Mac.java line 
> 203:
> 
>> 201:                 // because this is a PBE Mac service. In addition to 
>> checking
>> 202:                 // the key, check that params (if passed) are 
>> consistent.
>> 203:                 PBEUtil.checkKeyAndParams(key, params, algorithm);
> 
> Both usages of `PBEUtil.checkKeyAndParams` have been removed (this is the 
> first one), so we should now remove it from 
> `src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/util/PBEUtil.java`.

Sure, will remove. less code to maintain.

> src/jdk.crypto.cryptoki/share/classes/sun/security/pkcs11/P11PBECipher.java 
> line 135:
> 
>> 133:             // because this is a PBE Cipher service. In addition to 
>> checking the
>> 134:             // key, check that params (if passed) are consistent.
>> 135:             PBEUtil.checkKeyAndParams(key, params, pbeAlg);
> 
> Both usages of `PBEUtil.checkKeyAndParams` have been removed (this is the 
> second one), so we should now remove it from 
> `src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/util/PBEUtil.java`.

Yes.

> test/jdk/sun/security/pkcs11/Mac/PBAMac.java line 114:
> 
>> 112:                     
>> "ae6b69cf9edfd9cd8c3b51cdf2b0243502f35a3e6007f33b1ab73568" +
>> 113:                     "2ea81ea562f4383bb9512ff70752367b7259b16f"),
>> 114:              macAssertionData("HmacPBESHA512", "HmacSHA512",
> 
> nit: all the `macAssertionData` calls are now indented with an extra space 
> (13 leading spaces in total).

Yes, should be 12 spaces.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24068#discussion_r2017585554
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24068#discussion_r2017588409
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24068#discussion_r2017587244

Reply via email to