On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 06:01:22 GMT, Alan Bateman <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Making it package private to `java.security` would avoid IDEs suggesting to >> add `InternalBinaryEncodable` to `switch` statements in `java.base` (outside >> of `java.security`). > >> Making it package private to `java.security` would avoid IDEs suggesting to >> add `InternalBinaryEncodable` to `switch` statements in `java.base` (outside >> of `java.security`). > > That sounds like an IDE issue in that IDEs shouldn't be suggesting to add > references to non-accessible classes. Yeah, but when editing `java.base` (to contribute to **OpenJDK**), the class is accessible (to `java.base`). ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31391#discussion_r3386900511
