On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Casper.Dik at Sun.COM wrote:
>Secondly, SMF has already proven to me to be too fragile because either
>the underlying database technology is not reliable or the way it uses
>that technology is prone to failures. Powercycling a system during
>certain parts of boot is almost guaranteed to cause the next boot to
>fail with a corrupted registry. The fact that that is even possible
>concerns me greatly; recovery is easy but requires manual intervention.
this is quite an important point given the fact that sshd is the
only remote (login) service started by default.
--
Jan Pechanec
