On Mar 19, 2008, at 9:06 AM, Jan Pechanec wrote: > On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Casper.Dik at Sun.COM wrote: > >> Powercycling a system during certain parts of boot is almost >> guaranteed to cause the next boot to fail with a corrupted registry.
Wow! I do I even need to say what that implies about SMF? This entire thread sounds a lot like the old SysV vs BSD debate. It's actually amazing that Sun survived the decision to abandon their (working) BSD for (broken/buggy) SysV. I don't think it was until about 2.4 that Solaris began to be a decent alternative. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The opinions expressed in this message are mine, not those of Caltech, JPL, NASA, or the US Government. Henry.B.Hotz at jpl.nasa.gov, or hbhotz at oxy.edu
