Henry B. Hotz wrote: > On Mar 19, 2008, at 9:06 AM, Jan Pechanec wrote: > > >> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Casper.Dik at Sun.COM wrote: >> >> >>> Powercycling a system during certain parts of boot is almost >>> guaranteed to cause the next boot to fail with a corrupted registry. >>> > > Wow! I do I even need to say what that implies about SMF? > > This entire thread sounds a lot like the old SysV vs BSD debate. It's > actually amazing that Sun survived the decision to abandon their > (working) BSD for (broken/buggy) SysV. I don't think it was until > about 2.4 that Solaris began to be a decent alternative.
Holy moly! I don't *ever* want to go back to managing services by "vi /etc/rc.local" ! :-) -- richard
