Mike Gerdts wrote: > On 3/30/07, Shawn M Emery <Shawn.Emery at sun.com> wrote: >> Roland Mainz wrote: >> > Shawn M Emery wrote: >> > >> >> <snip> >> >> >> > >> > One minor nit: >> > "kserver" is a very generic name. IMO it may be better to name it >> > "kdcserver" or "krbserver" to make sure it doesn't collide with other >> > projects using the "k*"-prefix. For example FreeWNN has a "kserver" and >> > AFAIK KDE has something which sounds similar... >> > >> >> It was named to match the client equivalent, kclient(1M), but I can see >> how it may be confusing. > > CLIP[1] would suggest that it should be named kdccfg or possibly > kdcmgr. Since kserver is not a server (daemon) naming it as such > sounds confusing to me.
kdccfg sounds good to me, since this really is about the configuration. The "management" part happens via SMF svcadm for the most part and the ongoing data management is via kadmin. -- Darren J Moffat
