On 24/03/2010 16:12, George Koutras wrote: > I think it is not that clear and easy yet. Remember osol is licensed > under ccdl and not all parts are open sourced (if I am not mistaken). > e.g. zfs is not yet fully opened, so it is still unclear and uncertain > how the suggested security repositories > would be implemented and at what extent.
ZFS is and always has been fully in usr/src under the CDDL. -- Darren J Moffat
