Thnx for the update Darren. You think there are no closed parts in opensolaris?
I was under the impression that some parts are closed. If this does not stand
then I see no reason why a security repo shouldn't be
implemented.
________________________________
From: Darren J Moffat <darr...@opensolaris.org>
To: George Koutras <koutras_g at yahoo.com>
Cc: Giovanni Tirloni <gtirloni at sysdroid.com>; security-discuss at
opensolaris.org; indiana-discuss at opensolaris.org
Sent: Wed, March 24, 2010 9:37:10 PM
Subject: Re: [indiana-discuss] Reporting Security Issues (Was: Free /support,
/security repository for 2010.x, wider OpenSolaris usage.)
On 24/03/2010 16:12, George Koutras wrote:
> I think it is not that clear and easy yet. Remember osol is licensed
> under ccdl and not all parts are open sourced (if I am not mistaken).
> e.g. zfs is not yet fully opened, so it is still unclear and uncertain
> how the suggested security repositories
> would be implemented and at what extent.
ZFS is and always has been fully in usr/src under the CDDL.
-- Darren J Moffat
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/security-discuss/attachments/20100324/2fa172c0/attachment.html>
