George, ? Many of the 'parts' that are closed source are either discontinued or 'closed-source' due to legal IPs from other IHVs or ISVs. If you look at certain 'high-end' Linux distributions, you'd run into the same situtation and you'd have to go to those vendors for further support (example: Nvidia or Marvell device drivers). ? So someone can provide SOME security support if it deals with FOSS?and those legalities, but not anything considered "closed"?by Oracle or their partners. You may squeeze water from a rock - but it won't give you?lemonade too (i.e. not at least without some divine intervention or you bringing the lemons). ? ~ Ken Mays ? - On Thu, 3/25/10, George Koutras <koutras_g at yahoo.com> wrote:
From: George Koutras <koutra...@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [indiana-discuss] Reporting Security Issues (Was: Free /support, /security repository for 2010.x, wider OpenSolaris usage.) To: "Darren J Moffat" <darrenm at opensolaris.org> Cc: security-discuss at opensolaris.org, indiana-discuss at opensolaris.org Date: Thursday, March 25, 2010, 7:06 AM I know you were referring to zfs but I just took it one step forward and asked if there are closed parts, but? Shawn has already covered this part. So, I think this list of no-open is quiet long and can be a stopper for a full blown security repo. ________________________________ From: Darren J Moffat <darr...@opensolaris.org> To: George Koutras <koutras_g at yahoo.com> Cc: Giovanni Tirloni <gtirloni at sysdroid.com>; security-discuss at opensolaris.org; indiana-discuss at opensolaris.org Sent: Thu, March 25, 2010 11:23:39 AM Subject: Re: [indiana-discuss] Reporting Security Issues (Was:? Free /support, /security repository for 2010.x, wider OpenSolaris usage.) On 24/03/2010 20:15, George Koutras wrote: > Thnx for the update Darren. You think there are no closed parts in > opensolaris? I was under the impression that some parts are closed. If That isn't what I said.? I corrected your example that ZFS was not fully open; it has always been fully open.???There are some parts of OpenSolaris that are closed.? As Sun/Oracle employees we were/are not allowed to say why they are closed (there are various legal reasons). > this does not stand then I see no reason why a security repo shouldn't be > implemented. It won't be possible for anyone employed by Oracle (or its affiliates) to be involved in that effort in any way. -- Darren J Moffat ? ? ? _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list indiana-discuss at opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/security-discuss/attachments/20100325/40add858/attachment.html>