On 22.05.11 15:59, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Raphael Coeffic writes:
I realize that this changes the behavior compared with 1.2, but it
should be still acceptable, isn't it?
it is acceptable, but in my opinion, not preferable.
Sorry Juha, we had to come up with something coherent for multiple
interfaces as well.
For example:
let's assume we have two interfaces: lo & eth0.
sip_ip=eth0
additional_interfaces=intern
sip_ip_intern=lo
Using the old semantic, this configuration would lead to the following
situation:
default interface:
sip_ip = [ip_on_eth0]
media_ip = [ip_on_eth0]
intern interface:
sip_ip = lo
media_ip = [ip_on_eth0]
I realize that this is a valid use-case. However, it is, I think, not
the most used.
With the current behavior, we would get following:
default interface:
sip_ip = [ip_on_eth0]
media_ip = [ip_on_eth0]
intern interface:
sip_ip = lo
media_ip = lo
I believe this makes more sense.
But there may be another solution which I have overseen, and would
better fit to everybody.
Cheers
Raphael.
_______________________________________________
Sems mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/sems
