My car did not make more hp with the Stillen, it made less.
On Daves car the AEBS results were good but on other cars, the Hotshot
consistantly performas much better than it did on daves. In my testing on
many SE-R's the Hotshot has no loss in bottom end power at all and much more
in mid and high end.
The AEBS header is much more difficult to install, has poor ground clearance
and hits the popular ST swaybars also.
Mike
>But how come in the December SCC, the AEBS header made so much more
>horsepower than the Hotshot both at lowend and highend. The hotshot dips
>below stock at many areas while the AEBS was always above. Judging from the
>dynos on SCC, shouldn't the hotshot be rated second crapiest in all-out
>average gain next to the pacesetter. The AEBS and S&S and even Stillen are
>better than the hotshot. Mike's car did better with the Stillen is due
>probably to the reason that he's done so many work to the engine such as
>increased compression, but for us mildly modded sr20de folks, shouldn't
>AEBS
>give us a better run for the money
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe, put "unsubscribe" (by itself) in the subject and send to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or use the form at <http://www.sentra.net/sml/>.
